Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!micro-heart-of-gold.mit.edu!newsswitch.lcs.mit.edu!nntp.TheWorld.com!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) Newsgroups: sci.physics Subject: Re: Dark Energy Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2018 06:25:16 +0000 (UTC) Organization: The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989 Lines: 18 Message-ID: References: <37ee30d4-3feb-4f88-9b7a-aee563d04169@googlegroups.com> <9c8097ad-061a-4b35-acb4-2bd016bfffa8@googlegroups.com> <63addab7-c0e0-4546-a2f9-ef6c22123007@googlegroups.com> <2e188267-7918-47ea-b086-0e25dfa19fc9@googlegroups.com> <47bf2934-b914-4f06-97e8-3f0587c0f698@googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: shell01.theworld.com X-Trace: pcls7.std.com 1523600716 8216 192.74.137.71 (13 Apr 2018 06:25:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@TheWorld.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2018 06:25:16 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: nn/6.6.5 Xref: csiph.com sci.physics:680918 john writes: >Odd >" >It's your model. It's your obligation to make the discerning prediction and >show WHY that follows as a necessary consequence of the model. That's >how scientists work. " >Guess the precessing thing has to show- high OR low. >Attophysics or radio telescopes If you want to have a model, John, you will have to describe relationships physically and mathematically, you will hae to demonstrate mathematically your relationships are consistent with what we already know about our universe (that rules out precessing galaxies for example), you will have to show why your relationships are superior to existing models, and you will have to make mathematical predictions that someone with the right equipment can actually do your math and make observations to see whether you are right or not.