Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!micro-heart-of-gold.mit.edu!newsswitch.lcs.mit.edu!nntp.TheWorld.com!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) Newsgroups: sci.physics Subject: Re: Dark Energy Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2018 06:14:59 +0000 (UTC) Organization: The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989 Lines: 19 Message-ID: References: <37ee30d4-3feb-4f88-9b7a-aee563d04169@googlegroups.com> <9c8097ad-061a-4b35-acb4-2bd016bfffa8@googlegroups.com> <63addab7-c0e0-4546-a2f9-ef6c22123007@googlegroups.com> <2e188267-7918-47ea-b086-0e25dfa19fc9@googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: shell01.theworld.com X-Trace: pcls7.std.com 1523600099 8216 192.74.137.71 (13 Apr 2018 06:14:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@TheWorld.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2018 06:14:59 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: nn/6.6.5 Xref: csiph.com sci.physics:680916 john writes: >Odd >"No evidence of FRACTAL layers of matter, which is what you said. " >What evidence would you expect? 1) Some evidence "layers" are there; 2) Some evidence that there are multiple different types (at least 4-5); 3) Enough knowledge about these 4+ types to detect a pattern; 4) The pattern can be described by a fractal (within error bars of what we can see) 5) If it's an infinite fractal, as opposed to a fern, the pattern would have to be quite definite and be able to be modeled mathematically. So far you are 0 for 5. There's evidence of, for example, dark matter but none that it is some other "layer", and the number of "layers" found so far is 1 (our own). Even you can imagine just one additional layer with just some handwaving at more.