Path: csiph.com!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!peer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 12:32:18 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes Newsgroups: alt.usenet.kooks,sci.physics Subject: Re: does anybody remember References: <1mk7k9t.18zzzpbvojgtpN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> <9f3d33fc4b52b05aee9f87981b37d46d@dizum.com> <304797b9015bacaee9efa3d708751352@dizum.com> Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 13:32:15 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable From: "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" Organization: AUKTard Polizia Message-ID: User-Agent: Opera Mail/1.0 (Win32) Lines: 663 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com X-Trace: sv3-Ze0TO/7HMpyDNqDOGe5rVbS4cHZjPUefBQ6qA1nX/z6QK0A9qKgm0FdjpDHa01CRqTDLF0seQXm5eu2!Q25fuIbExOwHjEcNXhUnRuFGmpwvF5BQZunooYpvwJ2JJ+wcxsGo54Npbnzo X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 X-Original-Bytes: 21779 X-Received-Bytes: 21893 X-Received-Body-CRC: 255625312 Xref: csiph.com alt.usenet.kooks:653157 sci.physics:563137 On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 12:16:22 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler = = Emeritus wrote: > Time to Wee hours bleating again, Spankard? LOL > >> On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 00:29:35 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangl= er > > LOL! > > > LOL! > > See 9 lines below, ClueTard. LOL > > Wrong. I posted a completely correct 170 volt peak L-N sinusoid, from > which I derived the completely correct 120 volt RMS L-N sinusoid, from= > which I derived the completely correct 208 volt RMS L-L sinusoid, with= > proper phase shift. You're just mad because you're too stupid to ever > do that, DildoRider. LOL > > Certainly not with your kooky sinewave subtraction equation. Remember,= > you're the moron who has claimed: > > 1) You derived a higher RMS voltage than the peak voltage the RMS > voltage was derived from. > > 2) You k'lamed a *doubling* of voltage as a resultant of all three > phases of 3-phase AC, akin to shorting all three phases together. > > 3) You k'lamed a result of 0 volts as a resultant of two phases of > 3-phase AC. > > 4) You demonstrated your inability to grasp why two phases *summed* > gave a sinewave of the same voltage but phase shifted 60 degrees from > each of the tributary sinewaves, such that the resultant is 180 > degrees phase from the remaining third phase. > > 5) You demonstrated your inability to grasp why all three phases of > 3-phase AC *summed* together gives a result of 0 volts. > > 6) You k'lamed you were feeding 240 volts to the *primary* of a > *substation* transformer, deriving 120 volts from the *primary* side, > then feeding that 240 volts to a 120/208 volt electrical feed... you > even went so far as to justify it with your kooky math, showing you > were deriving 208 volts from 240 volts. Then you backpedaled and > k'lamed you were instead feeding the primary with a voltage of "12 > kVA" (DildoRider's blather), proving you don't know the difference > between voltage and apparent power. > > And you still don't know what a gable is. 150 IQ? LOL > > SPNAK! > > No, you got the *correct* result in that graph, DildoRider. The first > time you've ever been right about anything. 150 IQ? LOL > > You moron, do you *still* not understand vector summation? Holy fuck, > how retarded are you? > > The resultant of two phases of 3-phase AC must only be a sinewave of > same frequency and amplitude as the two tributaries, phase-shifted to > be 60 degrees off from and in between the two tributaries and 180 > degrees from the remaining third leg. If you're getting any other > result, your kooky equation is *wrong*, DildoRider. > > Backpedal harder, Lying Spankard. LOL > > Piling reading comprehension problems on top of backpedaling, > DildoRider? Why are you such a moron? LOL > > Bwahahaaa! You moron. Your kooky sinewave subtraction equation has > your brain so twisted in knots you're making a fool of yourself. LOL > > The resultant of two phases of 3-phase AC must only be a sinewave of > same frequency and amplitude as the two tributaries, phase-shifted to > be 60 degrees off from and in between the two tributaries and 180 > degrees from the remaining third leg. If you're getting any other > result, your kooky equation is *wrong*, DildoRider. > > Translation: > "Please, oh please, oh please, FNVWe, let me in on that secret that > every scientist and engineer since 1748 has known and used. I'm far > too stoooopid to Google for it, and far too stoooopid to ever properly= > use it, so please baby-step me through it using monosyllabic words." > > Moronism noted. 150 IQ? LOL > > It might have to do with the fact that you're a mathematical moron. > LOL > > The resultant of two phases of 3-phase AC must only be a sinewave of > same frequency and amplitude as the two tributaries, phase-shifted to > be 60 degrees off from and in between the two tributaries and 180 > degrees from the remaining third leg. If you're getting any other > result, your kooky equation is *wrong*, DildoRider. > > Thus the resultant of the three phases of 3-phase AC must only be 0 > volts, as you can easily ascertain with a simple Google search... > oh... wait... you're too stoooopid to use Google. LOL > > Your kooky equation *didn't* "work correctly", DildoRider. Try it > again, and this time, try not to make yourself look like a fucking > moron. LOL > > I did graph it, you moron. That you don't even know why that result > *must* be, otherwise your kooky equation is *wrong*, is part and > parcel of your retardation. LOL > > Bwahahaaa! DildoRider denies that the resultant of the three phases of= > 3-phase AC is always 0, hence 3-phase AC represents a full circle > represented in sinusoid. > > Holy shit, DildoRider... if you get any dumber they're gonna have to > jump-start your brain. LOL > > No, they're not. You're just a mathematical moron. LOL > > No, they don't. You're just a mathematical moron. LOL > > No, they don't. You're just a mathematical moron. LOL > > For DC, Moron. For AC, superposition dictates that vector *summation* > must be used. > > Except your bad sinewaves are as fucked up as your kooky sinewave > subtraction equation, which is fucked up as your broken brain, > DildoRider. LOL > > Your math is horribly broken, DildoRider. That's *why* you're Robert > Michael Wolfe the Mathematical Moron. LOL > > Except a simple Google search will prove you wrong. You're simply too > stupid to do that Google search, so instead you spew Man-Goo, > Spaghetti Code and Bad Sinewaves. Because you're Robert Michael Wolfe > the Mathematical Moron. LOL > > Bwahahaaaa! So wrong that the word "wrong" is the wrong word to > describe how wrong it is, DildoRider. You can't even get the phase > shift *or* the resultant voltage correct. You moron. LOL > > Says the backpedaling bleatfarting bad sinewave-spamming mathematical > moron. LOL > > BWAHAHAHAA! k0oky k'lames that a voltmeter between phase legs of 3-phase will produc= e = 170 volts!! > > Blue - Phase 1 (170 volts, 0 degrees), Tributary 1 > Orange - Phase 2 (170 volts, 120 degrees), Tributary 2 > Purple - Phase 3 (170 volts, 240 degrees) > Green - Resultant (170 volts, 60 degrees) > Red - Resultant (170 volts, 60 degrees) > > You'll note the red/green sinewave and the purple sinewave are 180 > degrees out of phase, exactly as they should be. Thus the resultant of= > the red/green sinewave and the purple sinewave will give a correct > result of 0. dude. a voltmeter across 2 phases of 3-phase doesn't read 170 volts. i= f = it does, then it's probably because you installed your own service. i = hope you didn't charge yourself a lot for that. the number you are looking for is sqrt(3)*170, g0ober. i guess your euler equations are horribly broken after all. ho-hum. > > You'll further note that both the red and green sinewaves are at the > same phase angle despite having the two phases interchanged in the > equation (green - 0 degrees first, 120 degrees second; red - 120 > degrees first, 0 degrees second). Whereas in your kooky equation > moving the tributaries in your equation gives different results. > > Why are you too stoooopid to find that Euler sinewave summation > equation, DildoRider? because i don't need it. the correct math produces correct results, muc= h = like correct phasor math does. http://i.imgur.com/4itzDIY.png notice how you're the one backpedaling, swapping summation for = subtraction, and hiding equations, bleaty. > Why are you far too stoooopid to figure out > vector summation, DildoRider? that's not what it says on my transcript right beside all of my physics = = and engineering courses. > > You're a mathematical moron improperly using a kooky sinewave > subtraction equation which gives you an improper result. what if the result was to make you bleat for 3 months and counting? :) > > SPNAK! > > You spent that time sucking dicks in a back alley, apparently. LOL your daydream fantasies are noted. > > Bwahahahaaa! Now calculate the resultant of that resultant as the > first tributary and the remaining third phase as the second tributary,= > DildoRider. Go on, *prove* yourself a mathematical moron. > > Mathematical Moron. LOL > > Wrong. The correct Euler sinewave summation equation has been used by > scientists and engineers since 1748, whereas your kooky sinewave > subtraction equation has only been in use for three months by only one= > thoroughly confused kooktard. LOL > > You mean the Euler sinewave summation equation, in use by scientists > and engineers since 1748? You yet again admit you're too stupid to > Google for it, and far too stupid to ever properly use it, despite > having been *given* the equation. Twice. LOL > > is that how *you* found out about it? LOL > > LOL! > > Already demonstrated, DildoRider. The 170 volt peak L-N, the 120 volt > RMS L-N which acted as tributary for the 208 volt RMS L-L, properly > graphed with the correct phase shift and amplitude. You can't > demonstrate that, because you're Robert Michael Wolfe the Mathematical= > Moron. LOL > > Both. 50 IQ? LOL > > Fag. LOL > Idiot. LOL > Moron. LOL > Tranny. LOL > Libtard. LOL > Crackhead. LOL > GableTard. LOL > DildoRider. LOL > Bad Musician. LOL > Stick Figure. LOL > Terrible Liar. LOL > Obsessed Retard. LOL > Sinewave Spammer. LOL > Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL > Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL > Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL > Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL > Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL > Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL > Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In Usenet History. LOL > -- = "sines, sines, everywhere there's sines blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind" http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu - FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID: = <3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com> ">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics >> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all: >> phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) >> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) >> voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in tim= e: >> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) =3D 240*sin(2*pi*60*x) Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking = *moron*? "The _sum_ E(=C3=8E=C2=B8) =C3=A2=E2=80=B0=C2=A1 E(a) + E(b) can be writ= ten thusly:"" it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to = real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds. it says that you're in denial = = about the inversion of your AC legs. http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/sin= gle-phase-power-systems/ http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png "To mathematically calculate voltage between =E2=80=9Chot=E2=80=9D wires= , we must subtract = voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each = other:" http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingl= eSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf on page 2: ** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the opposite direction - i.e., 180=C2=B0 apart from the phase of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A) *COUGH* SPNAK!! - i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASC= II = art if you ask nicely. see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com> - snickerTurds can't seem to refute the following: - begin snickerSinewaveStew.cpp -- /* HOW TO RUN: download arbitrary precision libraries from: http://www.hvks.com/Numerical/arbitrary_precision.html place those files in a directory and save this file as = snickerSinewaveStew.cpp inside that same directory. compiles with: gcc -Wall -I. precisioncore.cpp snickerSinewaveStew.cpp -lstdc++ run with: ./a.out enjoy the LULZ ;) */ #include #include using namespace std; int main(){ //float_precision MIN=3Dfloat_precision(0); //float_precision MAX=3Dfloat_precision(0); float_precision STEP=3Dfloat_precision(.0001); float_precision t=3Dfloat_precision(0); // time variable float_precision sum=3Dfloat_precision(0); // sum of SnickerTurd's = ridiculous sinewave mess float_precision snickerPrediction=3Dfloat_precision(2550.25); // = snickerTurd's erroneous k0oK-k'lame Sum float_precision PI; PI =3D_float_table(_PI,25); // this while loop will run forever, but snickers doesn't understand = why while(sum < snickerPrediction){ // fakey's Sinewave Stew(TM) see: MID: = sum =3D (float_precision(150) * float_precision( = sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) + = (float_precision(20.25) * float_precision( = sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) + = (float_precision(1400)* float_precision( = sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +(float_precision(20= )* = float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) + = (float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_prec= ision(2)*PI*t))) = + = (float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_pr= ecision(2)*PI*t))); // perhaps show a few values larger than +2300 to educate teh = snickerTurds if(sum>float_precision(2300)){ cout << "t=3D" << t << " sum=3D" << sum << std::endl; } t =3D t+STEP; } /* Message-ID: "Oh, yeah... it's 2550.25 volts... so why does your graph not even reach 2500 volts, given that eventually all the sinewaves will constructively interfere (ie: *add* to each other) to *sum* to 2550.25 volts?" Fakey, it doesn't reach 2500 volts because the summation of your sinewav= es = never reaches that. They never reach their max values at the same time.= = That's how stupid you are. Message-ID: <731d08dcc702b9a8a13077ffc201e91f@dizum.com> "I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts" Fakey, you only *proved* that you are too inept to graph the equations a= nd = notice a few things about the interactions of their frequencies when = summed. the next line of code is never executed, but snickers DEFINITELY can't = figure out why it isn't and instead has a bunch of lame excuses while = still having not produced a value for t where the sum=3D2550.25, as he h= as = k0okily proklamed in many usenet messages that are archived FOREVER. */ cout << "snickerTurds was right! the sum is " << sum << " at time t=3D= " << = t < - Somewhere Abouts Round Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly = Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: Fag. LOL Idiot. LOL Moron. LOL Tranny. LOL Libtard. LOL Crackhead. LOL GableTard. LOL DildoRider. LOL Bad Musician. LOL Stick Figure. LOL Terrible Liar. LOL Sinewave Spammer. LOL Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL is where my usenet lord and mas-ter can go straight to hell* *hell doesn't exist. hope everybody is having a productive evening. - http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg http://cafepress.com/kooktown http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg - If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: header= s = containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to = yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints= = to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful = information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :) if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you = downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try= : = http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2 - http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority =E2= =80=94 as = it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjec= ts = or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it = presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written, = Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homewor= k = before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason = many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating = opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd - Coming soon! To a newsgroup near you!: $ perl fakeyBot.pl FakeyBot> I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you= , = look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassi= ng = bile from behind an anonymous dizum account? You> Robert Michael Wolfe FakeyBot> Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-to= ed = boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks, = Robert. Robert> you talk about cocks a lot. FakeyBot> Oh, I talk about sex a lot? Robert> gay sex, mostly... FakeyBot> Fag! (just as useful as the original!) - snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n= = friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message = : "That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users we= re = using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then w= e = figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers = while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using = process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden = service. It's not rocket science. _The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum ho= w = I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can= = get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my = distinct impression was that the "anonymity research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to trade CP._ (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a = = kiddie pr0n network.) That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation Onymous was just icing on the cake." - Golden Killfile, June 2005 KOTM, November 2006 Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007 Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006 Busted Urinal Award, April 2007 Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008 Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007 AUK Mascot, September 2007 Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2= 016 =