Path: csiph.com!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!peer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 00:14:07 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes Newsgroups: alt.usenet.kooks,sci.physics Subject: Re: KOOKSOOT! References: Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 01:14:06 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable From: "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" Organization: AUKTard Polizia Message-ID: User-Agent: Opera Mail/1.0 (Win32) Lines: 526 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com X-Trace: sv3-c8ixFp6viNhZe/SXysZNOpou1+pudyfWVFI9MQzL3CRRt4jloFJF4hbcJR5e0SlKeztOl6tqn9ttkt7!xuxdqs8+agJOELZPv1aVZClXHqWsQu9DzjxHjsdqmLILUbBtFNZKh4g7hLBi X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 X-Original-Bytes: 18243 X-Received-Bytes: 18357 X-Received-Body-CRC: 4000901192 Xref: csiph.com alt.usenet.kooks:652720 sci.physics:562535 if you would like to add the person who posts as "FNVWe" to your lawsuit= , = please email me at rob.wolfe@gmail.com. On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 00:59:48 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler = = Emeritus wrote: > James McGinn babbled: > >> FNVWe wrote: > >>> If, as James McGinn claims, latent heat of evaporation doesn't >>> exist because a phase change doesn't occur upon evaporation >>> and thus clusters of water are launching into the air upon >>> evaporation, then the *only* heat that can be carried away >>> is specific heat, which would be equivalent to 2326 J/kg. >>> >>> If, however, as Joseph Black and innumerable scientists >>> since the 1700s have proven, latent heat of evaporation >>> *does* exist, there will be 2,500,000 J/kg carried away. >>> This result will null the underlying premise of Mr. McGinn's >>> claims, thus disproving his entire "theory". >>> >>> It's a simple experiment, and given that Mr. McGinn has made >>> claims that fly in the face of 250+ years of experimentally, >>> empirically measured data, the onus is upon Mr. McGinn to >>> prove his claims. >>> >>> That Mr. McGinn continues to avoid doing that simple experiment >>> to prove his extraordinary claims speaks volumes, don't you think? >>> >>> In the balance hangs Mr. McGinn either likely being nominated >>> for a Nobel Prize for overturning 250+ years of rigorously and >>> empirically measured scientific data, or his being forced to >>> retract his claims and his claims being subsumed into the heap >>> of odd theories that are used as examples of wrong-headedness. >>> >>> Do you wonder why Mr. McGinn continues to refuse to prove his claims= ? > >> The issue here would not be improved by me replicating an >> experiment because the obstacle here isn't rational it's political. >> No non-meteorologists with any authority is going to risk their >> position by contradicting a long-held belief (and one that seems >> rather obscure to anybody that is an outsider to the atmospheric >> sciences) of the meteorological monopoly. And, for similar reasons, >> no meteorologist is going to even acknowledge the issue. They are >> quite comfortable sitting back and letting the FNVWe's of the world >> shout down anybody that has the temerity to point out that the >> emperor is naked. >> >> The only way to get them to acknowledge the issue will be in a >> court of law as a result of a class action lawsuit =C3=A2=E2=82=AC=E2= =80=9C which I am >> working towards. > > "the obstacle here isn't rational it's political" LOL! > > The obstacle here is your denying well-established > experimentally-derived empirically-observed science which has been > going on with greater and greater accuracy for more than 250 years, > James. > > Further, your refusal to substantiate your claims with any sort of > experimental data (said experiment the responsibility for which falls > to you and only you, given that you've made claims that fly in the > face of that 250+ years of established science) means you know the > experiment will null your supposition and thus relegate your > unscientific suppositions to the midden heap of history as just > another case of someone gone outside the bounds of the scientific > method and making up fantastical fairy tales that do not and cannot > reflect reality. > > Your refusal to substantiate your claims further proves what I said > was right... you prefer your delusion, in which you paint yourself as > smarter than every scientist in the last 250+ years, to reality. > > You were provided the means to substantiate your claims, James. If, as= > you claim, latent heat of evaporation doesn't exist because a phase > change doesn't occur upon evaporation and thus clusters of water are > launching into the air upon evaporation, then the *only* heat that can= > be carried away is specific heat, which would be equivalent to 2326 > J/kg. > > If, however, as Joseph Black and innumerable scientists since the > 1700s have proven, latent heat of evaporation *does* exist, there will= > be 2,500,000 J/kg carried away. This result will null the underlying > premise of your claims, James, thus disproving your entire "theory". > > Your being wrong is painful to you, isn't it, James? Knowing you are > wrong and that you are being called to account for your being wrong is= > perturbing you to the point that you=C3=A2=E2=82=AC=E2=84=A2re "workin= g towards" "class > action lawsuits"... what we on Usenet know as kooksoots... yet another= > prototypical manifestation of Dunning-Kruger afflicted individuals > refusing to believe they could ever be wrong. > > Do you really believe any "class action lawsuit" will be allowed to > proceed without that experimentally-derived empirically-observed > scientifically-rigorous data, James? You'd best get right on > performing that experiment if you want your "class action lawsuit" to > have any chance whatsoever, James. > > Meanwhile, James, how about you get right on addressing the multiple > holes in your fairy tale of a "theory"? > > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > > How are your atmospheric "water droplets" forming if they're plasma, > Jim? > > Do you not know what the definition of "plasma" is, James? > > How is your "plasma not-a-plasma" (which you have admitted is a > hypothetical construct so your claims have even a semblance of > plausibility) forming if the nuclear binding energy and dissociation > energy of water are identical, and thus the water will dissociate into= > hydrogen and oxygen unless hit with an extremely energetic laser, Jim?= > > Where is the energy (equivalent to photons of 103.32 nm wavelength, > extremely strong ultraviolet, just 3.32 nm away from x-rays... except > photons with shorter wavelength than 121 nm are absorbed high above > the troposphere because they ionize air so well) coming from in the > troposphere to form your "plasma not-a-plasma", Jim? > > How is the energy to plasmize your "plasma not-a-plasma" not > dissociating all water on the planet and killing all life on the > planet given that the energy *must* be in the troposphere where nearly= > all the water is, and where all life is, Jim? > > Now that it's been proven that water molecule polarity doesn't change > upon H bonding (which would have side effects such as random changes > in the solvent properties of water... and we know those properties do > not randomly change, Jim), and in fact the two spin isomers of water > molecules account for the different H bonding strengths which account > for evaporation and condensation, do you still contend that your > claims are workable, Jim? > > Why can't you answer those questions, Jim? > > > -- = "sines, sines, everywhere there's sines blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind" http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu - FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID: = <3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com> ">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics >> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all: >> phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) >> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) >> voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in tim= e: >> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) =3D 240*sin(2*pi*60*x) Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking = *moron*? "The _sum_ E(=C3=8E=C2=B8) =C3=A2=E2=80=B0=C2=A1 E(a) + E(b) can be writ= ten thusly:"" it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to = real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds. http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/sin= gle-phase-power-systems/ http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png "To mathematically calculate voltage between =E2=80=9Chot=E2=80=9D wires= , we must subtract = voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each = other:" http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingl= eSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf on page 2: ** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the opposite direction - i.e., 180=C2=B0 apart from the phase of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A) *COUGH* SPNAK!! - i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASC= II = art if you ask nicely. see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com> - snickerTurds can't seem to refute the following: - begin snickerSinewaveStew.cpp -- /* HOW TO RUN: download arbitrary precision libraries from: http://www.hvks.com/Numerical/arbitrary_precision.html place those files in a directory and save this file as = snickerSinewaveStew.cpp inside that same directory. compiles with: gcc -Wall -I. precisioncore.cpp snickerSinewaveStew.cpp -lstdc++ run with: ./a.out enjoy the LULZ ;) */ #include #include using namespace std; int main(){ //float_precision MIN=3Dfloat_precision(0); //float_precision MAX=3Dfloat_precision(0); float_precision STEP=3Dfloat_precision(.0001); float_precision t=3Dfloat_precision(0); // time variable float_precision sum=3Dfloat_precision(0); // sum of SnickerTurd's = ridiculous sinewave mess float_precision snickerPrediction=3Dfloat_precision(2550.25); // = snickerTurd's erroneous k0oK-k'lame Sum float_precision PI; PI =3D_float_table(_PI,25); // this while loop will run forever, but snickers doesn't understand = why while(sum < snickerPrediction){ // fakey's Sinewave Stew(TM) see: MID: = sum =3D (float_precision(150) * float_precision( = sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) + = (float_precision(20.25) * float_precision( = sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) + = (float_precision(1400)* float_precision( = sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +(float_precision(20= )* = float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) + = (float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_prec= ision(2)*PI*t))) = + = (float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_pr= ecision(2)*PI*t))); // perhaps show a few values larger than +2300 to educate teh = snickerTurds if(sum>float_precision(2300)){ cout << "t=3D" << t << " sum=3D" << sum << std::endl; } t =3D t+STEP; } /* Message-ID: "Oh, yeah... it's 2550.25 volts... so why does your graph not even reach 2500 volts, given that eventually all the sinewaves will constructively interfere (ie: *add* to each other) to *sum* to 2550.25 volts?" Fakey, it doesn't reach 2500 volts because the summation of your sinewav= es = never reaches that. They never reach their max values at the same time.= = That's how stupid you are. Message-ID: <731d08dcc702b9a8a13077ffc201e91f@dizum.com> "I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts" Fakey, you only *proved* that you are too inept to graph the equations a= nd = notice a few things about the interactions of their frequencies when = summed. the next line of code is never executed, but snickers DEFINITELY can't = figure out why it isn't and instead has a bunch of lame excuses while = still having not produced a value for t where the sum=3D2550.25, as he h= as = k0okily proklamed in many usenet messages. */ cout << "snickerTurds was right! the sum is " << sum << " at time t=3D= " << = t < - Somewhere Abouts Round Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly = Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: Fag. LOL Idiot. LOL Moron. LOL Tranny. LOL Libtard. LOL Crackhead. LOL GableTard. LOL DildoRider. LOL Bad Musician. LOL Stick Figure. LOL Terrible Liar. LOL Sinewave Spammer. LOL Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL is where my usenet lord and mas-ter can go straight to hell* *hell doesn't exist. hope everybody is having a productive evening. - http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg http://cafepress.com/kooktown http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg - If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: header= s = containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to = yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints= = to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful = information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :) if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you = downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try= : = http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2 - http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority =E2= =80=94 as = it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjec= ts = or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it = presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written, = Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homewor= k = before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason = many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating = opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd - Coming soon! To a newsgroup near you!: $ perl fakeyBot.pl FakeyBot> I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you= , = look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassi= ng = bile from behind an anonymous dizum account? You> Robert Michael Wolfe FakeyBot> Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-to= ed = boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks, = Robert. Robert> you talk about cocks a lot. FakeyBot> Oh, I talk about sex a lot? Robert> gay sex, mostly... FakeyBot> Fag! (just as useful as the original!) - snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n= = friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message = : "That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users we= re = using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then w= e = figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers = while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using = process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden = service. It's not rocket science. _The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum ho= w = I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can= = get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my = distinct impression was that the "anonymity research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to trade CP._ (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a = = kiddie pr0n network.) That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation Onymous was just icing on the cake." - Golden Killfile, June 2005 KOTM, November 2006 Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007 Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006 Busted Urinal Award, April 2007 Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008 Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007 AUK Mascot, September 2007 =