Path: csiph.com!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!peer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 11:49:42 -0600 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes Newsgroups: alt.usenet.kooks,sci.physics Subject: Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland References: <28189e9d-b2ff-46d5-b481-1d26a1d37491@googlegroups.com> <1eec5218be076f1b769f0767452071ec@dizum.com> <2672eb90dn09kcti3g5btree34sgmnr85i@4ax.com> <977c26d5d56e557194faa9e7baf7195d@dizum.com> Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 12:49:44 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable From: "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" Organization: AUKTard Polizia Message-ID: User-Agent: Opera Mail/1.0 (Win32) Lines: 662 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com X-Trace: sv3-0IaaKxPP5dS/DpuBMJZUfnkSXFc4OxYY1nNF/7gU6dX3mmZABjkxRU5v4UixdQtetcx0N2NiKzXGrkD!VHNQtu0szToBhOsQpl6gFtECMnWSkdJo88DU53/UkvMYhkPZbHo2EvL1fo7w X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 X-Original-Bytes: 21721 X-Received-Bytes: 21835 X-Received-Body-CRC: 514825647 Xref: csiph.com alt.usenet.kooks:651919 sci.physics:561185 On Thu, 10 Mar 2016 12:36:10 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler = = Emeritus wrote: > Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. > > Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Brain), in > did thusly jump head= > first into the wood chipper again: > >> FNVWe stomped a retard's brain flat. Again: > >>> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Brain), in > >>>> FNVWe stomped a retard's brain flat. Again: > >>>>> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Brain), in > >>>>>> FNVWe stomped a retard's brain flat. Again: > >>>>>>> vallor, in did thusly ju= mp >>>>>>> head first into the wood chipper again: > >>>>>>>> =3D=3D| RMS quantities such as electric current are usually = >>>>>>>> calculated over >>>>>>>> one cycle. However for some purposes the RMS current over a = >>>>>>>> longer period >>>>>>>> is required when calculating transmission power losses. The sam= e >>>>>>>> principle applies, and (for example) a current of 10 amps used = = >>>>>>>> for 12 >>>>>>>> hours each day represents an RMS current of 5 amps in the long = = >>>>>>>> term. |=3D=3D >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Root_mean_square#Average_electric= al_power > >>>>>>> Exactly, which is why the RMS calculation is the DC *equivalent*= = >>>>>>> of an >>>>>>> AC waveform, that DC voltage which would dissipate the same amou= nt = >>>>>>> of > >>>>>> So now you're claiming that RMS is a DC voltage? > >>>>> So you're now admitting you don't know the definition of the word >>>>> "equivalent". LOL > >>>> So now you're admitting the RMS value doesn't change over >>>> the course of the cycle. > >>> Are you retarded? It averages the sinewave only as the last step, > >> This is obviously wrong, faketard, since the average value >> of a sinusoid is 0. > > The mean average of the squares is not zero, you moron. LOL the squares of each sample are all positive, unlike a sine waveform. > >> That's exactly what you get if you >> measure AC with a DC voltmeter. >> >> Stop being a self-referential buffoon. > > Says the self-referential buffoon who Googled "self-referential", then= > ran to Usenet to bleat in hopes it'd make him look more not-retarded. > LOL > >>> merely so humans with tiny brains can grasp what they're looking at.= >>> There would be no need of averaging if the underlying signal were no= t >>> a sinusoid, you fecking nong. LOL >>> >>> {{{ I imagine with that last sentence, a tiny little 1/4 watt >>> clue-light has lit in DildoRider's and Shiny Tinfoil Brain's empty >>> skulls... and they'll yet again embarrassedly drag-ass away to nurse= >>> their bootfucked asses. }}} >>> >>> The underlying signal that is being averaged is still a sinewave, > >> No it's not. The signal that is being averaged is sin^2. > > Moron now k'lames: > sin^2 (x) =3D (sin(x))^2 > Let's assume x =3D 170 volts > sin(170) =3D .34664945549 > ..34664945549^2 =3D 0.12016584499 > > > > Unless the moron is talking about degrees instead of radians, which > would make him even more wrong: > > > > IOW, Shiny Tinfoil Brain yet again demonstrates that he's a > mathematical moron. LOL > > SPNAK! > >>> because the *instantaneous* sampling > >> What sampling? > > Of, FFS, now Shiny Tinfoil Brain denies that a voltmeter does any > sampling. If you can't even discuss reality, there's little point in > you even trying, you moron. > >> We already know that the voltage is >> sinusoidal. The average of sin^2 is not that difficult to >> calculate (for people who aren't math morons). > > I just calculated it above, proving you're a math moron. LOL > >> So, why bring up sampling, when we can calculate the exact >> average of sin^2, without quantization errors, rectangular >> area approximations, or recursive number-crunching? > > Because you're a mathematical moron. LOL > >>> is *instantaneous* peak-to-peak >>> of the peak voltage sinewave. The sampling is not of the "peak" >>> voltage for each sampling. You moron. Are you going to display your >>> inability to discern between peak and peak-to-peak again, Moron? > >> Meaningless gibberish. > > To you. Because you're a mathematical moron. LOL > >>>> Thanks for admitting i'm right and you are wrong, >>>> Ersatziette. > >>> MID? No? Do you believe telling lie after lie is an effective means = of >>> "winning, for fuck sake"? > >> I just explained it, Ersatzia. > > And proved you're a mathematical moron. LOL > >> Stop telling lie after lie. It's not an effective means of >> "winning", ffs. > > Says Shiny Tinfoil Brain whilst looking in the mirror, after having > taken his meds. LOL > >>>> What's the electronegativity of oxygen? > >>> Free oxygen or the oxygen atom in a water molecule, you conflating >>> moronic kooktard? > >> Wrongola, Ersatzia. Red herring alert! The >> electronegativity of an oxygen ATOM is a fixed value, like >> the RMS value of a waveform. It's a factor in determining >> how the atom bonds, just like its atomic number is. Not a >> function of what it's bonded to. That's why >> electronegativities of elements are often shown in the >> periodic table. > > Still trying to conflate the electronegativity of elemental oxygen > with that of the oxygen atom in a water molecule and prove that PhD > professor of applied sciences wrong, eh, Moron? LOL > > > London South Bank University - Physics Department > Martin Chaplin BSc PhD CChem FRSC > Emeritus Professor of Applied Science > 111 peer-reviewed studies published > 3 books published > 3 patents granted > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D > Due to the relatively large positive charge on the oxygen atom nucleus= > (8+) and the closeness of its electrons, the oxygen atom attracts > electrons much more strongly (i.e. is much more electronegative) than > the hydrogen atoms (1+). This results in a charge transfer from the > hydrogen atoms towards the oxygen atom and, hence, the polarity of the= > water molecule. > > Early 5-point molecular models, with explicit negative charge where > the lone pairs are purported to be, fared poorly in describing > hydrogen bonding, but more recent models show some promise. Although > there is no apparent consensus of opinion [116], such descriptions of > substantial sp3-hybridized lone pairs in the isolated water molecule > should perhaps be avoided [117], as an sp2-hybridized structure (plus > a pz orbital) is indicated. > > The molecule H2O has 10 electrons associated, 8 from the oxygen atom > and one each from the two hydrogen atoms. > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D > > SPNAK! > > I bet you wish you could be right just once, huh, Moron. > > > >> But, at least, you realize now that electronegativity !=3D >> atomic number. > > I never said it was, Moron. Do you believe constantly lying is an > effective means of "winning, for fuck sake", Shiny Tinfoil Brain? LOL > >> So, what's the electronegativity of oxygen? Fakey?... > > > London South Bank University - Physics Department > Martin Chaplin BSc PhD CChem FRSC > Emeritus Professor of Applied Science > 111 peer-reviewed studies published > 3 books published > 3 patents granted > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D > Due to the relatively large positive charge on the oxygen atom nucleus= > (8+) and the closeness of its electrons, the oxygen atom attracts > electrons much more strongly (i.e. is much more electronegative) than > the hydrogen atoms (1+). This results in a charge transfer from the > hydrogen atoms towards the oxygen atom and, hence, the polarity of the= > water molecule. > > Early 5-point molecular models, with explicit negative charge where > the lone pairs are purported to be, fared poorly in describing > hydrogen bonding, but more recent models show some promise. Although > there is no apparent consensus of opinion [116], such descriptions of > substantial sp3-hybridized lone pairs in the isolated water molecule > should perhaps be avoided [117], as an sp2-hybridized structure (plus > a pz orbital) is indicated. > > The molecule H2O has 10 electrons associated, 8 from the oxygen atom > and one each from the two hydrogen atoms. > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D > > And all of the above backed up by 2517 peer-reviewed studies by people= > far smarter and saner than you, Moron. > > SPNAK! > > I bet you wish you could be right just once, huh, Moron. > > > >> https://www.google.com/search?q=3Delectronegativity+of+oxygen >> >> You will continue to get k00kspanked until you answer >> correctly, and we know you already know the answer. > > Says the moron, as he self-spanks. LOL > >> "Ok, Shiny Tinfoil Brain, you are right. I am WRONG! The >> electronegativity of an oxygen atom is _.__, it's NOT >> identically equal to atomic number. You pwn me, Sir." >> >> You will feel soooooo much better, and so will your >> cherry-red ass. Guaranteed! > > Blither-blather from a blither-blathering moron who's proven himself a= > blither-blathering reality-denying mathematical moron. > > Why are you so stupid, Shiny Tinfoil Brain? > > > -- = "sines, sines, everywhere there's sines blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind" http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu - FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID: = <3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com> ">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics >> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all: >> phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) >> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) >> voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in tim= e: >> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) =3D 240*sin(2*pi*60*x) Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking = *moron*? "The _sum_ E(=C3=8E=C2=B8) =C3=A2=E2=80=B0=C2=A1 E(a) + E(b) can be writ= ten thusly:"" it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to = real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds. http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/sin= gle-phase-power-systems/ http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png "To mathematically calculate voltage between =E2=80=9Chot=E2=80=9D wires= , we must subtract = voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each = other:" http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingl= eSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf on page 2: ** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the opposite direction - i.e., 180=C2=B0 apart from the phase of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A) *COUGH* SPNAK!! - i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASC= II = art if you ask nicely. see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com> - snickerTurds can't seem to refute the following: - begin snickerSinewaveStew.cpp -- /* HOW TO RUN: download arbitrary precision libraries from: http://www.hvks.com/Numerical/arbitrary_precision.html place those files in a directory and save this file as = snickerSinewaveStew.cpp inside that same directory. compiles with: gcc -Wall -I. precisioncore.cpp snickerSinewaveStew.cpp -lstdc++ run with: ./a.out enjoy the LULZ ;) */ #include #include using namespace std; int main(){ //float_precision MIN=3Dfloat_precision(0); //float_precision MAX=3Dfloat_precision(0); float_precision STEP=3Dfloat_precision(.0001); float_precision t=3Dfloat_precision(0); // time variable float_precision sum=3Dfloat_precision(0); // sum of SnickerTurd's = ridiculous sinewave mess float_precision snickerPrediction=3Dfloat_precision(2550.25); // = snickerTurd's erroneous k0oK-k'lame Sum float_precision PI; PI =3D_float_table(_PI,25); // this while loop will run forever, but snickers doesn't understand = why while(sum < snickerPrediction){ // fakey's Sinewave Stew(TM) see: MID: = sum =3D (float_precision(150) * float_precision( = sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) + = (float_precision(20.25) * float_precision( = sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) + = (float_precision(1400)* float_precision( = sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +(float_precision(20= )* = float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) + = (float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_prec= ision(2)*PI*t))) = + = (float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_pr= ecision(2)*PI*t))); // perhaps show a few values larger than +2300 to educate teh = snickerTurds if(sum>float_precision(2300)){ cout << "t=3D" << t << " sum=3D" << sum << std::endl; } t =3D t+STEP; } /* Message-ID: "Oh, yeah... it's 2550.25 volts... so why does your graph not even reach 2500 volts, given that eventually all the sinewaves will constructively interfere (ie: *add* to each other) to *sum* to 2550.25 volts?" Fakey, it doesn't reach 2500 volts because the summation of your sinewav= es = never reaches that. They never reach their max values at the same time.= = That's how stupid you are. Message-ID: <731d08dcc702b9a8a13077ffc201e91f@dizum.com> "I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts" Fakey, you only *proved* that you are too inept to graph the equations a= nd = notice a few things about the interactions of their frequencies when = summed. the next line of code is never executed, but snickers DEFINITELY can't = figure out why it isn't and instead has a bunch of lame excuses while = still having not produced a value for t where the sum=3D2550.25, as he h= as = k0okily proklamed in many usenet messages. */ cout << "snickerTurds was right! the sum is " << sum << " at time t=3D= " << = t < - Somewhere Abouts Round Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly = Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: Fag. LOL Idiot. LOL Moron. LOL Tranny. LOL Libtard. LOL Crackhead. LOL GableTard. LOL DildoRider. LOL Bad Musician. LOL Stick Figure. LOL Terrible Liar. LOL Sinewave Spammer. LOL Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL is where my usenet lord and mas-ter can go straight to hell* *hell doesn't exist. hope everybody is having a productive evening. - http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg http://cafepress.com/kooktown http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg - If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: header= s = containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to = yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints= = to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful = information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :) if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you = downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try= : = http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2 - http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority =E2= =80=94 as = it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjec= ts = or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it = presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written, = Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homewor= k = before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason = many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating = opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd - Coming soon! To a newsgroup near you!: $ perl fakeyBot.pl FakeyBot> I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you= , = look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassi= ng = bile from behind an anonymous dizum account? You> Robert Michael Wolfe FakeyBot> Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-to= ed = boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks, = Robert. Robert> you talk about cocks a lot. FakeyBot> Oh, I talk about sex a lot? Robert> gay sex, mostly... FakeyBot> Fag! (just as useful as the original!) - snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n= = friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message = : "That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users we= re = using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then w= e = figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers = while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using = process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden = service. It's not rocket science. _The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum ho= w = I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can= = get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my = distinct impression was that the "anonymity research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to trade CP._ (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a = = kiddie pr0n network.) That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation Onymous was just icing on the cake." - Golden Killfile, June 2005 KOTM, November 2006 Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007 Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006 Busted Urinal Award, April 2007 Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008 Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007 AUK Mascot, September 2007 =