Path: csiph.com!optima2.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.glorb.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 23:15:43 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.conspiracy,alt.usenet.kooks,sci.physics
Subject: Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming
References: <IvSdnbywPI3tJUnInZ2dnUU7-REAAAAA@giganews.com> <mr2fnr$u94$1@speranza.aioe.org> <6423342cd2285a3db97fe4d18253b02d@dizum.com> <op.x3nm91kntm21m2@benson.localhost> <912488b37266b47a0fa782f0f8a9d45f@dizum.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 00:15:40 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable
From: "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1>
Organization: AUKTard Polizia
Message-ID: <op.x3o94e2btm21m2@benson.localhost>
User-Agent: Opera Mail/1.0 (Win32)
Lines: 487
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-bsPUSi72vHEbF1YhkUExqy3FZjFlbI29VLgD9+dLzphpnd3ZY1yp1VCdN3gALuPdsiWl998xctWz+0V!mKPy8ZGew04+YX/7Vo9cDBELiNW1XH1g43uCoOAjKuSOYx4rzj5zk7Y9uvJX3Q==
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 25573
Xref: csiph.com alt.astronomy:273164 alt.conspiracy:264423 alt.usenet.kooks:597337 sci.physics:515507

On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 12:13:03 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler =
 =

Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>
> Robert M. Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop
> Jockey), socked up as root@127.0.0.1, in
> <news:op.x3nm91kntm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head
> first into the wood chipper again:
>
>> On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 00:17:47 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangl=
er
>> Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>
>>> Solar and orbital forcing, the same causes of every other
>>> interglacial and glaciation period throughout earth's history,
>>> explain the 18 year 10 month pause in "global warming" quite
>>> nicely.
>>>
>>> Out of the total 750 gigatons moving through the carbon cycle
>>> each year, we produce only 29 gigatons. That is largely offset by
>>> nature absorbing 18 gigatons more than it gives off. So we're
>>> only adding 11 gigatons per year net. And nature will, naturally,
>>> ramp up to absorb that, as it has done throughout earth's
>>> history... if it hadn't, CO2 levels would have reached "runaway"
>>> levels long before we ever came on the scene.
>
>> and that's only been happening for about 50 years.  right?
>
> Solar output in the Ordovician was very nearly what it is today
> (0.991 Ordovician, 1 today), yet CO2 concentrations in the
> Ordovician were at least 5 times higher than today. And yet the
> Ordovician slipped into an ice age that last ~1,000,000 years.
>
> If, as you libtard Klimate Katastrophe Kooks k'lame, CO2 is a
> driver of temperature change, given that CO2 levels are at least
> 5 times lower today, why aren't we in a perpetual ice age?
>
> And if, as you k'lame, the earth is unable to cope with the tiny
> amount of extra CO2 humankind puts into the environment, just how
> did it cope through the Ordovician?
>
> Stop being such an environmental Chicken Little dumbshit and wake
> up to reality, you moron. Earth's never had it so good under our
> stewardship.
>
> <snicker>
>
>>> Anthropogenic CO2 contributes 1 ten millionth of one percent to
>>> temperature forcing, as has been proven mathematically. And given
>>> that the temperature forcing is negatively correlated with CO2
>>> concentration due to the efficient re-emission to space of
>>> infrared by CO2, as CO2 levels rise, temperature drops will
>>> become more severe on the night side of the planet, just as
>>> happens on Mars.
>>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DtDGgGttVvk4>
>
>>> No. Climate change whackadoodles lie. *And* they use flawed
>>> computer programs to generate alarmist global warming propaganda.
>>> Message-ID: <8f8bdad9840a40c99b0afe28d0a2055c@dizum.com>
>>>
>>> Klimate Katastrophe Kook K'lame #4: 97% of climate experts agree
>>> humans are causing global warming
>>>
>>> SPNAK! #4
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> The "97% of climate scientists agree" is an outright lie:
>>> Message-ID: <c407c7d08fb6911ec5f4f90971e41c78@dizum.com>
>>> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
>>> The LibTard environmental whackadoodles keep bleating about "97%
>>> of climate scientists agree that global warming is human
>>> caused!".
>>>
>>> Where did this 97% figure come from?
>>>
>>> When you explore its lineage, it turns out to be about as
>>> convincing as a Chicago election. The most prominent form of it
>>> comes from a professor in Australia named John Cook at the
>>> University of Queensland.
>>>
>>> What Cook's study purported to do was to review the abstracts
>>> (not the entire papers, just the abstracts) of 11,000 climate
>>> science articles.
>>>
>>> But when you read the first paragraph of Cook's abstract for his
>>> study, it says, "We find that 66.4% of abstracts expressed no
>>> position on anthropogenic global warming, 32.6% endorsed
>>> anthropogenic global warming, 0.7% rejected it, and 0.3% were
>>> uncertain."
>>>
>>> That means only 1/3 of those papers had an opinion on
>>> human-caused global warming. The next sentence in Cook's abstract
>>> for his study says, "Among abstracts expressing a position on
>>> human-caused global warming, 97.1% endorsed the consensus
>>> position that humans are causing the warming."
>>>
>>> 11000 * .326 =3D 3586 * .971 =3D 3482
>>> (3482 / 11000) * 100 =3D 31.65% of climate scientists agree that
>>> global warming is human-caused. And those 31.65% aren't even all
>>> "climate scientists"... a good majority of them are research
>>> assistants and college students who write the (non-peer reviewed)
>>> papers that the lead researchers (mainly associated with the IPCC
>>> and other politicized "scientific" entities) put their names on.
>>>
>>> But then, LibTard environmental whackadoodles are gullible and
>>> stupid... they can't pull their heads out of liberalism's ass
>>> long enough to do their own research, and even if they could,
>>> that hard math eludes them.
>>> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
>
>>> Klimate Katastrophe Kook K'lame #1: Climate reacts to whatever
>>> forces it to change at the time; humans are now the dominant
>>> forcing
>>>
>>> SPNAK! #1
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> Not according to a former IPCC lead author.
>>> Message-ID: <71581f83f38e08d06eae2b440227d0ff@dizum.com>
>>> <http://dailycaller.com/2015/05/22/former-un-lead-author-global-warm=
ing-caused-by-natural-variations-in-climate/>
>>> <http://multi-science.atypon.com/doi/abs/10.1260/0958-305X.26.3.417>=

>>> <http://multi-science.atypon.com/doi/pdf/10.1260/0958-305X.26.3.417>=

>>> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D
>>> Global temperature change observed over the last hundred years or
>>> so is well within the natural variability of the last 8,000
>>> years, according to a new paper by a former Intergovernmental
>>> Panel On Climate Change (IPCC) lead author.
>>>
>>> Dr. Philip Lloyd, a South Africa-based physicist and climate
>>> researcher, examined ice core-based temperature data going back
>>> 8,000 years to gain perspective on the magnitude of global
>>> temperature changes over the 20th Century.
>>>
>>> What Lloyd found was that the standard deviation of the
>>> temperature over the last 8,000 years was about 0.98 degrees
>>> Celsius - higher than the 0.85 degrees climate scientists say the
>>> world has warmed over the last century.
>>>
>>> "This suggests that while some portion of the temperature change
>>> observed in the 20th century was probably caused by greenhouse
>>> gases, there is a strong likelihood that the major portion was
>>> due to natural variations", Lloyd wrote in his study.
>>>
>>> But even surface temperature data showed a hiatus in warming for
>>> about 15 years or so. Scientists have offered up dozens of
>>> explanations for why global temperatures have been flat since the
>>> late 1990s. The most prominent explanation is that oceans have
>>> been absorbing most of the "heat" from increased greenhouse gas
>>> emissions, meaning surface temperatures show less warming than
>>> they otherwise would.
>>>
>>> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D
>>> {NOTE: That's entirely untrue. NASA JPL itself did the research
>>> and determined that ocean temperature at depth had not changed
>>> one iota.
>>>
>>> <http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2014/06oct_aby=
ss/>
>>> <http://iceagenow.info/2014/10/nasa-stumped-deep-oceans-warmed-2005/=
>
>>> "When scientists at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) in
>>> Pasadena, California, analyzed satellite and direct ocean
>>> temperature data from 2005 to 2013, they found that "the ocean
>>> abyss below 1.24 miles (1,995 meters) has not warmed measurably",
>>> the space agency announced in a press release on Monday.
>>> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>
>>> The *only* "global warming" is that which resides in those flawed
>>> computer climate models the libtard environmental whackadoodles
>>> keep trying to sell.
>
>>> Klimate Katastrophe Kook K'lame #5: The last decade 2000-2009 was
>>> the hottest on record.
>>>
>>> SPNAK! #5
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> Another blatant lie.
>>> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
>>> Message-ID: <15ce479ee9f780168fcff750b5b112a8@dizum.com>
>>> Message-ID: <08866ced31c10d3747efb9bf43b3d981@dizum.com>
>>> Message-ID: <0b42119ce54a8e54585eabda09d60ae6@dizum.com>
>>> Message-ID: <460825f8b0e76514eae0c7d9ffb79558@dizum.com>
>>> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
>>> Taken from the hacked ClimateGate 2.0 emails:
>>> "Observations do not show rising temperatures throughout the
>>> tropical troposphere unless you accept one single study and
>>> discount a wealth of others. This is just downright dangerous. We
>>> need to communicate the uncertainty and be honest.", writes Peter
>>> Thorne of the UK Met Office, "I also think the science is being
>>> manipulated to put a political spin on it which for all our sakes
>>> might not be too clever in the long run", Thorne adds.
>>>
>>> <http://www.reportingclimatescience.com/news-stories/article/global-=
warming-pause-hits-18-years-on-rss-data.html>
>>> Using UK Met, UAH and RSS data.
>>>
>>> Page 11 - Global temperature rate (C per year): dropping since
>>> ~1998. *Negative* since ~2005. That means temps have been
>>> dropping for ~17 years, and the gullible LibTarDs have been lied
>>> to for ~17 years:
>>> <http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/media/pdf/e/f/Paper1_Observing_changes_=
in_the_climate_system.PDF>
>>>
>>> Message-ID: <b41f4a8054430ac46092e607919d7063@dizum.com>
>>> Even NASA admitted that global temperatures were falling in
>>> recent years (before they pulled that page... luckily the WayBack
>>> Machine archived it):
>>> <http://web.archive.org/web/20030816225534/http://icp.giss.nasa.gov/=
research/methane/greenhouse.html>
>>> Note the center trace for modern times in that graphic...
>>> *falling* temperature, even as CO2 and methane rose.
>>> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
>
>>> "Global warming" or "anthropocentric climate change" or
>>> "anthropogenic climate disruption" or whatever the Klimate
>>> Katastrophe Kooks are calling it now in trying to sell bull shit
>>> as steak is nothing but a politicized scam... even the "climate
>>> scientists" flogging the "global warming" scam know it...
>>> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
>>> Taken from the hacked ClimateGate 1.0 and ClimateGate 2.0 emails:
>>> <http://tomnelson.blogspot.com/2012/01/email-4141-glimpse-into-clima=
te-science.html>
>>> "I think the notion of telling the public to prepare for both
>>> global warming and an ice age at the same time creates a real
>>> public relations problem for us."
>>>  - Asher Minns, "climate scientist" from scandal-rocked
>>> University of East Anglia, letting the cat completely out of the
>>> bag.
>>>
>>> The "climate scientists" know an ice age is coming... but their
>>> paymasters are telling them to flog global warming so those
>>> politicians can set up their carbon exchanges. The politicians
>>> will be ground floor investors in those carbon exchanges, which
>>> will increase the cost of living for everyone by hundreds of
>>> billions of dollars per year (remember Obama saying "electricity
>>> rates would necessarily skyrocket"? Yeah. Because the politicians
>>> would force the utilities to line the pockets of the politicians
>>> via the carbon exchange tax, and the utilities would pass that
>>> cost on to the consumers.)... all so those politicians can reap
>>> hundreds of millions of dollars per year in profits selling a
>>> solution that does nothing to solve a problem that doesn't exist.
>>> Anthropogenic global warming is a politicized scam, nothing more.
>>> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
>>>
>>> Message-ID: <b0d12057982df5cafade09fac73454fd@dizum.com>
>>> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
>>> This is further borne out by the fact that the Antarctic ice
>>> sheet has been adding 49 Gt / year of land ice (and the sea ice
>>> is expanding faster than ever) since 2003, per Nasa's ICEsat,
>>> despite liberal whackadoodles k'laming it's losing ice at an
>>> unprecedented rate:
>>> Message-ID: <b5b82a4693774b84e8c96c06910bfb2e@dizum.com>
>>>
>>> This is borne out by the length of the Arctic melting season
>>> declining for the past 5 years, according to sidads.colorado.edu:
>>> http://oi45.tinypic.com/27yr1wy.jpg
>>>
>>> This is borne out by the fact that the "Annoying Lead Time
>>> Indicator" graph shows temperature trending downward:
>>> http://chiefio.wordpress.com/2012/12/29/annoying-lead-time-graph/#co=
mment-44336
>>> "Both the Greenland and the Antarctica temperatures are lower
>>> than their peaks. They are generally trending downward overall.
>>> Antarctica in particular lead on the way up, and is lower than
>>> Greenland now. Furthermore, we know that right now ice is
>>> accumulating in Antarctica. Greenland is the tail on the
>>> Antarctic dog... And our W/m2 line is continuing in a decent
>>> downward slope. Harder to see in that Milankovitch Cycles
>>> composite graph. (Inspecting it, I was hoping we were already AT
>>> the bottom. We are not.) So we have a bit more drop in W/m2
>>> before we start back up, and we are below the energy level that
>>> pulls us out of a glacial, once one begins. All in all, this
>>> graph tells me that we are on the knife edge of a drop into a
>>> cold stage and acceleration into a glacial stage, from which we
>>> can not recover. (This is, in some ways, just a confirmation of
>>> the 416 W/m2 or so number from prior plunges =C3=83=C2=A2=C3=A2=E2=80=
=9A=C2=AC=C3=A2=E2=82=AC=C5=93 but on a graph
>>> showing that our drop in W/m2 is not yet done dropping.)"
>>>
>>> This is borne out by the fact that Alaska has overall cooled by
>>> 2.4 F since 2000:
>>> http://www.alaskadispatch.com/article/forget-global-warming-alaska-h=
eaded-ice-age
>>> You'll note that the "global temperatures surge hotter and the
>>> ice-cap crumbles" quote was due to scientists falsifying data.
>>> Observation of these phenomena proves that global temperatures
>>> are falling, and ice caps are adding ice.
>>>
>>> This is borne out by the fact that we've had a 90 year *cooling*
>>> trend that the climate change scientists got caught trying to
>>> falsify data to make it appear as though it were a warming trend:
>>> Message-ID: <2c1ef34505cceac90d11237317727e33@dizum.com>
>>>
>>> This is borne out by the fact that there have been 129
>>> climate-related scandals to date, from outright falsification of
>>> data to unintentional data errors that were left intact because
>>> their removal would put truth to the climate change alarmist's
>>> lies:
>>> http://notrickszone.com/climate-scandals/
>>>
>>> Ironically, while a certain astronomical scientist demands
>>> peer-reviewed scientific literature (then ignores it when it is
>>> provided), the IPCC's errors stem primarily from reliance upon
>>> non-peer reviewed sources for their data, making it all too easy
>>> for climate change alarmists to use the IPCC as a platform for
>>> advancing their agenda. Of course, the IPCC has the same agenda,
>>> so those using it for that purpose are never called to account.
>>>
>>> And of course, the scientific research that absolutely blows out
>>> of the water the notion that CO2 is the cause of global warming
>>> is the *fact* that CO2 follows solar and orbital-forcing induced
>>> global warming by 600 to 1000 years, as even SkepticalScience.com
>>> admits.
>>> Message-ID: <2c1ef34505cceac90d11237317727e33@dizum.com>
>>>
>>> And of course, the climate change alarmists are loath to remind
>>> anyone that changes in temperature measurement methods was what
>>> introduced errors that led to the IPCC (and hence the US EPA)
>>> declaring anthropogenic global warming in the first place, but
>>> when the necessary corrective factors are applied to the data,
>>> their claim of anthropogenic temperature increases is severely
>>> reduced. That, combined with the observed increase in
>>> stratospheric water vapor content (remember, water vapor is a
>>> *much* larger contributor to greenhouse warming than CO2), wipes
>>> out even more of the IPCC's claim of AGW.:
>>> http://www.masterresource.org/2010/02/why-the-epa-is-wrong-about-rec=
ent-warming
>>>
>>> In fact, the man who started the 1970's "ice age" scare, and who
>>> was instrumental in advancing the current "global warming" scare,
>>> NASA scientist James Hansen, has said in 1999:
>>> http://www.giss.nasa.gov/research/briefs/hansen_07/
>>> "Yet in the U.S. there has been little temperature change in the
>>> past 50 years, the time of rapidly increasing greenhouse gases =C3=83=
=C2=A2=C3=A2=E2=80=9A=C2=AC=C3=A2=E2=82=AC=C2=9D
>>> in fact, there was a slight cooling throughout much of the
>>> country."
>>>
>>> (You will note that it was none other than James Hansen who later
>>> lied and claimed 1998 to be the warmest year on record.)
>>>
>>> Well there you go... one of NASA's own scientists and currently
>>> one of the largest proponents of the AGW scaremongering,
>>> admitting that from 1940 onward to 1999, temperature actually
>>> went down... but he changed his tune after the global warming
>>> scare mongers changed the data so that the heat wave of the
>>> 1930's (remember 1934's record breaking heat wave and dust bowl,
>>> anyone?) appeared to be *less* than 1998 temperatures (remember
>>> 1998's dust bowl, anyone? No? Hmmm. That's because it was merely
>>> an El Nino year, and the Heat Index was much lower than that in
>>> 1934.), thereby making it appear as though anthropogenic global
>>> warming was taking place.
>>>
>>> http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-London/2014/06/23/Global-warming-=
Fabricated-by-NASA-and-NOAA
>>>
>>> http://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2014/06/23/noaanasa-dramatically-=
altered-us-temperatures-after-the-year-2000/
>>>
>>> Of course, we now know the lack of a warming trend in the US was
>>> due to accurate measurement of temperature, said data being
>>> changed later, whereas other countries (notably Europe) were
>>> fudging the numbers long before US scientists... the US
>>> politicians finally caught onto the game around 2000, and
>>> colluded with the climate scientists to change the US data to
>>> start their own scare-mongering / profit scamming.
>>>
>>> So what we've got here is a bunch of scientists led by the nose
>>> because they wanted to continue receiving research grants,
>>> getting caught falsifying data so they could please those giving
>>> them those grants, all driven by corrupt liberal politicians who
>>> were attempting to commit the world's largest-ever con game on
>>> humanity. That falsified data was going to be used by certain
>>> politicians to set up "carbon exchanges" from which they would
>>> have reaped billions of dollars in profits. A secondary purpose
>>> of this politician-led global warming scam is as an instrument of
>>> authority to impose public policy that the politicians know
>>> they'd have no chance of otherwise imposing upon the populace.
>>>
>>> Had they believed their own hype, Al Gore wouldn't be living in a
>>> veritable mansion that's 4 times larger than surrounding homes
>>> and which used 12 times more energy than surrounding homes, and
>>> which was only able to lower its energy consumption by 11% after
>>> extensive renovation and "greening". According to Snopes, most
>>> homes used 20% to 30% more electricity during the 2009 summer
>>> than Gore's home... but only because Gore was almost never home,
>>> he was jetting around the world to give speeches, and pumping
>>> more greenhouse gasses into the atmosphere than the next 100
>>> people combined.
>>>
>>> So the truth has been revealed, and the con game is collapsing
>>> before their eyes.
>>>
>>> And for certain liberal whackadoodle astronomical scientists
>>> who've been 180 degrees out on every single thing they've
>>> k'lamed, it's just one more example of why liberalism is a mental
>>> disease that combines equal parts unquestioning gullibility,
>>> fawning deference to so-called "experts", dismissal of any
>>> evidence that refutes their kooky worldview, and disingenuous
>>> alteration of any evidence they think they can get away with
>>> altering to "prove" their point.
>>>
>>> At the rate scientists are going, it wouldn't surprise me if
>>> their credibility were soon less than that of Congresscritters.
>>>
>>> SPNAK!
>
> DildoRider just hates all that truthiness and reality up above...
> it hurts his little LibTard brain. LOL
>

only an idiot would think that dumping chemicals into the atmosphere sin=
ce  =

the industrial revolution doesn't have any long-term effects.  thanks fo=
r  =

stepping up and letting everybody know that you're an idiot.

ironic, given that you clearly appreciate science, you just seem to have=
  =

enough of a stake in conservative whackjob politics to cherry-pick what =
 =

you claim is the TRVTH.

-- =

http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg

http://cafepress.com/kooktown

http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg

If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: header=
s  =

containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to  =

yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints=
  =

to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful  =

information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public.  :)

if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you  =

downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try=
:  =

http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2

--