X-Received: by 10.99.124.91 with SMTP id l27mr7179391pgn.135.1486927310460; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 11:21:50 -0800 (PST) Path: csiph.com!feeder.erje.net!2.us.feeder.erje.net!news.glorb.com!e137no625013itc.0!news-out.google.com!g47ni2130qta.0!nntp.google.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!spln!extra.newsguy.com!newsp.newsguy.com!news6 From: "F. Russell" Newsgroups: sci.physics,comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.usenet.kooks Subject: Re: We ( humanity ) _invent dimensions to simplify things. Date: 12 Feb 2017 19:24:13 GMT Organization: NewsGuy - Unlimited Usenet $23.95 Lines: 22 Message-ID: References: <4c47aa43-6b1e-40bb-af57-1e31e4490a16@googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: p0e9ad950ee359c094fd96af56f2f1d9dd8ab89211f877eb4.newsdawg.com Mime-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Pan/0.140 (Chocolate Salty Balls; GIT b8fc14e git.gnome.org/git/pan2) X-Received-Bytes: 1760 X-Received-Body-CRC: 4126914266 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Xref: csiph.com sci.physics:618343 comp.os.linux.advocacy:396389 alt.usenet.kooks:719920 On Sun, 12 Feb 2017 13:32:19 -0500, Wally W. wrote: > > A clue: The world already has too many arrogant pricks who have a > complusion to "prove" others were "wrong." > You are talking only to yourself, arrogant idiot. Examine this thread and you will discover that it was YOU that attempted to overturn my statement that a deterministic process can exhibit unquestionable randomness. It was YOU that compulsively jumped in to the discussion bringing your bullshit contrary "proof." As I said, you are WAY out of your league. So keep your stupid mouth shut. A completely deterministic process can exhibit pure randomness. Case closed. Fuck you.