Path: csiph.com!feeder.erje.net!1.us.feeder.erje.net!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!newsswitch.lcs.mit.edu!nntp.TheWorld.com!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) Newsgroups: sci.physics Subject: Re: Processes that _consume_ energy. Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2016 22:24:42 +0000 (UTC) Organization: The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989 Lines: 23 Message-ID: References: <576b90b1-4d6f-490c-918b-614d6a0aaedd@googlegroups.com> <9d3511df-c203-4666-8d0f-33545edbbac8@googlegroups.com> <0391560d-9add-4840-8705-7c324adc94e9@googlegroups.com> <08313541-2033-4664-accb-7a68a0dcdfb5@googlegroups.com> <09f696e3-c1d3-4d3b-8276-670b8d167f0a@googlegroups.com> <62a02eda-008f-4026-8a4c-772acdaf617c@googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: shell01.theworld.com X-Trace: pcls7.std.com 1470608682 29126 192.74.137.71 (7 Aug 2016 22:24:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@TheWorld.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2016 22:24:42 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: nn/6.6.5 Xref: csiph.com sci.physics:592258 john tarded: >Mickey >We were discussing the halo. Wrong. You explicitly mentioned globular clusters, in Message-ID: : The galaxy is at the Center of a spherical : Bi-layered halo of old globular clusters- : one layer flowing one way and : the second flowing another. : How do your "laws" explain that? And you mentioned the bi-layered globular clusters in another reply as well. Should I rub your nose in that as well? I pointed out that globular clusters do not orbit in any bi-layers, they orbit in their own randomly aligned orbits. Proving your claim wrong. Quit moving the goal posts.