Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!micro-heart-of-gold.mit.edu!newsswitch.lcs.mit.edu!nntp.TheWorld.com!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) Newsgroups: sci.physics Subject: Re: Small enough- to be zero? Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 15:25:27 +0000 (UTC) Organization: The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989 Lines: 14 Message-ID: References: <46c420a6-5807-460c-b9ba-669fda1dd39b@googlegroups.com> <07d7cb62-2581-4eb5-966d-2b0752137168@googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: shell01.theworld.com X-Trace: pcls7.std.com 1469114727 1081 192.74.137.71 (21 Jul 2016 15:25:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@TheWorld.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 15:25:27 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: nn/6.6.5 Xref: csiph.com sci.physics:590194 john tarded: >I think you missed the point. >The point is: there is ORDER at a >size scale JUST ABOVE where you say >there is no order. >Ergo. >QM is totally full of shit. You repeatedly CLAIMED that, but where is the evidence? Where is the scientific falsification? Where is there an observation or experiment where the outcome if a lower level of order exists is A but the outcome if there is no lower level of order is B?