Path: csiph.com!feeder.erje.net!2.us.feeder.erje.net!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!micro-heart-of-gold.mit.edu!newsswitch.lcs.mit.edu!nntp.TheWorld.com!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Subject: Re: Trouble in LIGO FraudLand. Not Everybody Is Happy
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 02:43:51 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <nm6u97$8j2$2@pcls7.std.com>
References: <aa4e8950-84fa-44e3-9c3d-9f5e5a54458d@googlegroups.com>  <nm0oj0$53j$1@pcls7.std.com> <f29a043e-3759-466e-85b2-065c5f8b861c@googlegroups.com>  <nm0qjv$sgo$2@gioia.aioe.org> <2a56490e-db65-4bc0-8c31-c3d06ff46661@googlegroups.com>  <nm0r3p$t8l$2@gioia.aioe.org> <6967ab4b-55c6-451a-af48-5eac95195538@googlegroups.com> <nm2rbt$1mkk$3@gioia.aioe.org> <6965ff60-8069-406f-9bf0-b864d737d3e5@googlegroups.com>  <nm5htd$1n1g$8@gioia.aioe.org> <e6e76333-9250-4873-9666-0df76697f4f2@googlegroups.com>  <nm5k8a$1r9h$1@gioia.aioe.org> <nm5kir$1rr0$1@gioia.aioe.org> <feced562-f694-4285-9246-469b112185de@googlegroups.com> <nm5m0i$1ud1$1@gioia.aioe.org>  <1db8374c-87a6-494e-b70f-56d761e3941c@googlegroups.com> <nm65c4$n9a$1@gioia.aioe.org>  <76e6c78f-34c2-460f-800b-70011174fc7e@googlegroups.com> <nm6c06$11r9$1@gioia.aioe.org> <015e6fe6-8c88-4225-b16d-f85f968710c6@googlegroups.com> <nm6dq3$14kg$1@gioia.aioe.org>  <dc1b7ec7-7b8c-4f5c-8c5b-337cf8ceee68@googlegroups.com> <nm6r71$5b8$1@pcls7.std.com>  <79d4b1b3-7365-408b-bce8-01b3a6e512f0@googlegroups.com> <nm6sto$5du$2@pcls7.std.com> <431e7dc9-81a3-4373-8f0e-e4ed90e51e8f@googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: shell01.theworld.com
X-Trace: pcls7.std.com 1468464231 8802 192.74.137.71 (14 Jul 2016 02:43:51 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@TheWorld.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 02:43:51 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: nn/6.6.5
Xref: csiph.com sci.physics:589172

john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes:
<
>Michael said
>"Simpler but wrong is not a good thing.  Invisible pink fairies pushing the 
>planets around is a very simple theory of gravity.  It's not a good 
>theory, however. "
>"Finding a simpler answer" presumes it to
>be "more right" or at least "as right"
>as the other. In math, at least.

So, now you are saying the invisible pink fairy gravity theory is the best
one? Because it is so simple?

>You believe in DM?
>Wow!

You really are having a tough time trying to find a 5 year old to explain 
it to you, aren't you.