Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!micro-heart-of-gold.mit.edu!newsswitch.lcs.mit.edu!nntp.TheWorld.com!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) Newsgroups: sci.physics Subject: Re: Juno probe already in trouble, with 13July correction of orbit; spinning out of control?? Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 15:06:03 +0000 (UTC) Organization: The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989 Lines: 16 Message-ID: References: <78b26000-433c-487d-838e-41ce2ce31b69@googlegroups.com> <8695b756-c214-481c-a79e-8395e6d16b20@googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: shell01.theworld.com X-Trace: pcls7.std.com 1468335963 14085 192.74.137.71 (12 Jul 2016 15:06:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@TheWorld.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 15:06:03 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: nn/6.6.5 Xref: csiph.com sci.physics:588899 john writes: >Michael >Juno is still on the road, yes. So, if gravity at Jupiter is different, like you claimed, why didn't Juno either crash into Jupiter or go flying off into space? Instead, that tricky orbital maneuver. which they had to get just right, worked... And why did Galileo work (within limits of antenna failure), orbiting Jupiter for many years? You can't answer these, but no matter what happens you'll go off posting crap about LeSage Gravity/how we have gravity at Jupiter all wrong.