Path: csiph.com!feeder.erje.net!1.us.feeder.erje.net!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!newsswitch.lcs.mit.edu!nntp.TheWorld.com!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) Newsgroups: sci.physics Subject: Re: Trouble in LIGO FraudLand. Not Everybody Is Happy Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 18:29:52 +0000 (UTC) Organization: The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989 Lines: 33 Message-ID: References: <984049d7-36aa-4339-8130-56de12428dd6@googlegroups.com> <460b72c3-7434-4af2-8117-2139a34c46b7@googlegroups.com> <0bc8578a-48a2-4e45-aea8-4c3474568eca@googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: shell01.theworld.com X-Trace: pcls7.std.com 1468261792 5235 192.74.137.71 (11 Jul 2016 18:29:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@TheWorld.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 18:29:52 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: nn/6.6.5 Xref: csiph.com sci.physics:588787 john writes: >Odd >I think for myself: gravitational waves >are stupid and impossible. John, don't forget something: In science, observation and measurement always trump theory, or "I think that..." thinking. You can come up with a beautiful proof that the noon sky is a light shade of orange, but if I observe the sky and it is blue, your beautiful theory is WRONG. Period. So you can come up with such things as benzene is a bunch of dancing spinny things, and a chemist detects properties of benzene that conflicts with dancing spinny things, then the dancing spinny thing theory is WRONG. And if you claim that "gravitational waves are stupid and impossible" and we keep detecting events that must be from gravitational waves, guess what. And it doesn't matter how much you whine about it. For now, we have to just wait and see what else LIGO and other experiments find. >For them even to exist, >you must first accept that Space has >STRUCTURE, Why do you claim this? > which until now, >you schizophrenic, you've argued AGAINST. >Now, you argue FOR Space having >structure? When did he do that?