Path: csiph.com!feeder.erje.net!2.us.feeder.erje.net!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!newsswitch.lcs.mit.edu!nntp.TheWorld.com!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Subject: Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 18:33:32 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989
Lines: 31
Message-ID: <neonps$1is$1@pcls7.std.com>
References: <64dec951-5c0a-4d93-9b28-90c7ae1791c2@googlegroups.com> <289d8847-4b44-4dc1-9b99-a36788f5919d@googlegroups.com> <negfa7$440$1@dont-email.me> <ce84e9ef-5e00-42b6-8c6a-a75e0c1dd153@googlegroups.com> <neh3ic$eq2$1@pcls7.std.com> <neh4l1$tik$1@gioia.aioe.org> <0e07994d-1cae-4203-9d48-04e3c19fdd8f@googlegroups.com> <neirrt$1et9$2@gioia.aioe.org> <791762b5-44fd-47dd-ab06-991a75afe647@googlegroups.com> <maqdnYSxVbKGxpDKnZ2dnUU7-WGdnZ2d@giganews.com> <a80dae68-72d9-405b-81fb-555dfb280240@googlegroups.com> <maqdnYKxVbIe85DKnZ2dnUU7-WGdnZ2d@giganews.com> <6bb2df88-a6ce-4be8-ac32-abac31ae6f3f@googlegroups.com> <b7Sdnb0Ob8JFOJDKnZ2dnUU7-QGdnZ2d@giganews.com> <61de4eff-220f-4952-95b3-215fbe6309f4@googlegroups.com> <mImPy.6848$C94.1975@fx39.iad> <nem0iq$f60$2@gioia.aioe.org> <fcce7908-f6c9-438a-9913-4da06dc764c4@googlegroups.com> <c734f2db-7461-4ab5-8726-3f1ac16d0c33@googlegroups.com> <4QIPy.864$h41.665@fx18.iad> <neo9jn$d92$2@pcls7.std.com> <2HQPy.7034$dR.5367@fx24.iad>
NNTP-Posting-Host: shell01.theworld.com
X-Trace: pcls7.std.com 1460658812 1628 192.74.137.71 (14 Apr 2016 18:33:32 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@TheWorld.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 18:33:32 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: nn/6.6.5
Xref: csiph.com sci.physics:570484

benj <none@gmail.com> writes:

>On 04/14/2016 10:31 AM, Michael Moroney wrote:
>>
>> Or perhaps Google simply drops posts that they know are spoofing addresses
>> under their control.
>>
>> : From: benj <none@gmail.com>
>>
>> They can tell your posts aren't from the real owner of "none@gmail.com"
>> (if there is one, and if not it's definitely fake) so they drop it.

>That is a reasonable theory. Only I understand some posts do get through.

>It is interesting that when I set up my USENET system I attempted to 
>post with no real email address (Nobody@nowhere) as I used to do. The 
>Newsreader refused to set up an account that way, while it did not 
>actually check to see if the email address was valid (as say some vendor 
>SPAM does) it was smart enough to know that such an address was not a 
>real one. So to properly "spoof" the Newsreader and set up an account to 
>post I had to start with a valid email provider (gmail.com) and then put 
>"none" as the user. And that satisfied my Nazi Newsreader (Thunderbird).

Why not use something like "nosuchisp.com" instead of "gmail.com"? Or use
".invalid" instead of ".com" the way "they" (the creators of RFCs) want
you to do when deliberately using an invalid email address? That way, if
someone "replies" to one of your posts instead of posting a followup, they
won't bother the owner of "none@gmail.com" (if there is one).

But no, you poked the big bear (Google) with a sharp stick, and now you
wonder why it's pissed at you...