Path: csiph.com!au2pb.net!feeder.erje.net!us.feeder.erje.net!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!newsswitch.lcs.mit.edu!nntp.TheWorld.com!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy,sci.physics
Subject: Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid.
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 18:00:27 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <muudrr$ad8$1@pcls7.std.com>
References: <pv6sdc-i6n.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <mugm1d$e1s$1@dont-email.me> <v20q0b99ucgj7gnj0gd6u6ggda0hj6lkr5@4ax.com> <mujtd8$b4v$1@dont-email.me> <26is0b1lcs6vtnb3827gng61jlcsb446nc@4ax.com> <muljed$jvp$1@dont-email.me> <ne5v0bdndgunpvudlpa41775ecq86cphkp@4ax.com> <MPG.3079b3c14aaa59f098c307@news.giganews.com> <lfm01b1ek8ba31dg89r0uac55r78j7cjij@4ax.com> <MPG.307a5fc17e65f0a998c309@news.giganews.com> <U-SdnagPOL5CrYzLnZ2dnUU7-IednZ2d@giganews.com> <jui21bl9b0088l1osj60adsn92pdl6frbk@4ax.com> <mutbn5$rm5$1@dont-email.me> <muu0gv$g67$1@pcls7.std.com> <NImdnWvmsdqdBo_LnZ2dnUU7-UudnZ2d@giganews.com> <muu7gr$2f2$1@pcls7.std.com> <q86dnZZUC7AfNY_LnZ2dnUU7-SGdnZ2d@giganews.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: shell01.theworld.com
X-Trace: pcls7.std.com 1444068027 10664 192.74.137.71 (5 Oct 2015 18:00:27 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@TheWorld.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 18:00:27 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: nn/6.6.5
Xref: csiph.com alt.conspiracy:269150 sci.physics:524692

"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:

>BTW I'm waiting for two things from you.

>1.  A photo of one of the CGIs used in Nuke York City to go with your photo 
>of a real 767.

Since there were no CGIs, I cannot do this.

I'm sure Google Images has plenty of photos of UA 175 just before impact.

>2.  A link that proves underground nukes in solid rock are no different than 
>above ground nukes.  <G>

K00ktard, it was you who made the outlandish claim of no EMPs from
underground nukes, so it's up to you to support that claim (if you can...
<snicker>).   I'm waiting....  and once again, actual proof, no lie-packed
kookvids....

And I already supplied you with a link how relatively shallow nukes in
solid rock produce "retarcs" of rock rubble, which was never seen at
Ground Zero.  Besides, one as shallow as 77 meters would break through,
producing a fireball, a 12,000' mushroom cloud and radiation galore...
"Sedan" did...and they drilled down nearly 200 meters for that one...