Path: csiph.com!au2pb.net!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!newsswitch.lcs.mit.edu!nntp.TheWorld.com!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy,sci.physics Subject: Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 14:05:48 +0000 (UTC) Organization: The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989 Lines: 42 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: shell01.theworld.com X-Trace: pcls7.std.com 1442585148 7100 192.74.137.71 (18 Sep 2015 14:05:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@TheWorld.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 14:05:48 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: nn/6.6.5 Xref: csiph.com alt.conspiracy:267833 sci.physics:521807 "K Wills (Shill #3)" writes: >On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 10:03:08 -0500, "Rocky" wrote: >>"Bast" wrote in message >>news:mtd0a8$hov$1@dont-email.me... >>> 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zaOOf0SwY08 >> >>Oh yes, because the software that added CGIs to hundreds of videos only >>dealt with buildings it had problems with a crane. See: >> > I saw where whomever altered the video did a poor job of making >the plane appear in front of the lines form the crane. And it's very >obvious the video had been altered. Even you will have noticed. Not >that your mental defects will permit you to be honest and admit it. I made several still images from that video, particularly as the plane crossed the crane cable. For those who aren't about to watch YA kookvid, it shows Flight 175 impacting the South Tower, viewed from somewhere to the east. There is a construction crane in the foreground and the plane flies behind it. The kook claim is that the image of the plane flies in front of the crane cable and then behind the crane arm, so "obviously it's faked". They replay it again at a slower speed, then twice more, magnified and slower so you can see the plane pass in front of the cable. What is faked is the replays. Still images of the normal speed video shows the plane as a blurry double exposure. The double exposure is from NTSC video interlacing, where the camera first scans and records the odd TV lines and then scans the even lines, but in the intervening 1/60 second, the plane has moved. (I am surprised the kooktards didn't kook about "the plane with 4 wings" or something) In all the replays the plane image is no longer a double exposure and is more detailed. How did they get detail not in the original? In addition, some of the images look like crude pastes of a rectangular image of the plane onto the background. In some of them, the crane cable doesn't even reach the plane, it stops at the edge of the paste rectangle. With NTSC scanning, MPEG compression, Youtube compression etc. it's hard to figure out all of what is going on. However it's obvious the replays of the event are not taken from the full speed clip of it.