Path: csiph.com!optima2.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!micro-heart-of-gold.mit.edu!newsswitch.lcs.mit.edu!nntp.TheWorld.com!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy,sci.physics Subject: Re: Ping FFN and jimp: Tell me some bullshit about what remained of the Twin Towers ( Michael caught in BIG LIEs ) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 15:42:01 +0000 (UTC) Organization: The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989 Lines: 77 Message-ID: References: <3r9fcc-nci.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <0YmdnYEIQdh9WmjInZ2dnUU7-SmdnZ2d@giganews.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: shell01.theworld.com X-Trace: pcls7.std.com 1442331721 10285 192.74.137.71 (15 Sep 2015 15:42:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@TheWorld.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 15:42:01 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: nn/6.6.5 Xref: csiph.com alt.conspiracy:267578 sci.physics:521289 "Rocky" writes: >And AGAIN if the following was not done by deep underground nukes then how >was it done where a building could collapse, not crush the survivors in >floors 2-6 of stairwell B, leave free standing walls and not end up in the >basement either? It was simply a slightly offcenter collapse and some really, really really good luck that spared the stairway from being crushed. There was nothing magic about the lobby floor that would have withstood the collapsing mass of 110 stories of building! As the collapsing mass smashed its way through the 4th, 3rd, 2nd floors it would have smashed its way through the lobby and then the subbasement floors with nothing to stop it until it reached the bedrock at the bottom of the bathtub. That picture you keep linking to proves it: > http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg as it shows the debris compacted to 70-80 feet, which is right for 110 floors of 95% air, and that 70-80 feet of rubble reaches close to street level. The standing exterior walls and Stairwell B remained standing because they were short enough to stand on their own (and the exterior walls were very strong on the lower levels) and by sheer luck avoided being hit by anything large enough to crush them. >And don't forget their was a way to set off nukes without leaving a seismic >record and that was to have the cavities already there. Now you are making things up. Complete bullshit. You simply cannot explain how three nukes could be detonated without generating three 5.5 magnitude earthquakes, each with the distinctive nuclear signature, that would have been detected throughout the whole world. >And your bullshit about the radiation was faced with the fact they didn't >test the soil samples at GZ and they certainly didn't take the samples from >anywhere near where the haze in the following photo is either. They tested for radiation before the buildings fell. As soon as they figured out it was a terrorist attack they tested for radiation, because they know that a "dirty bomb" type attack would be a favorite of terrorists, and would be very, very bad for NYC. No unusual radiation was detected, and that rules out any sort of nuclear devices. >This will give you a list of videos that show that some people replaced a >CGI of a jet with a CGI of a ball instead. > https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=9%2F11+the+ball Why do you keep posting a link to overly compressed, overly shrunken videos that prove nothing except excessive shrinkage and compression loses detail from videos? >> Yup. He plots it coming in _dead level_ and wonders where it was when he >> extrapolates its position back in time coming in dead level with the >> impact level. That's because he didn't look up. Of course he couldn't >> look up, the camera didn't look up. It was focusing on the North Tower, >> not looking for a second plane. >Even if you took it up a few degrees it would still be in the wide shot you >idiot. Nope. I plotted it against that video just before the first zoom in. >Why don't you just take a protractor and see how steep the dive would have >to be not to be in the wide shot? Why not do it yourself? Oh, that's right, you flunked math and don't know how. >>>9/11 PLANE WING DISAPPEARS AS IT HITS TRADE CENTER TOWER! CGI HOLOGRAM? >> >> MPEG artifact, most likely. What was the make/model of that videocamera >> and what method does it use for video compression? >ROTFLMAO because to this date the only person that could recreate that >anomaly was someone using a 3D program and having the wings reflect the sky. How could they reproduce it without the exact same camera filming the exact same scene so that the camera will compress it the exact same way?