Path: csiph.com!xmission!feeder.erje.net!us.feeder.erje.net!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!newsswitch.lcs.mit.edu!nntp.TheWorld.com!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy,sci.physics Subject: Re: Plane truth ( To the Ediot there were no hijacked jets on 9/11) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 22:05:18 +0000 (UTC) Organization: The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989 Lines: 53 Message-ID: References: <61n9vad4n79ri31png2vvtv4aiit26kka7@4ax.com> <8er9vatsogtj7n5kg660lejcrd1vavl5ee@4ax.com> <4s2dnUe926VDy2jInZ2dnUU7-UWdnZ2d@giganews.com> <04139028-272a-4db3-92fb-89cad3debb3b@googlegroups.com> <7bmdnY2T2e9lkWvInZ2dnUU7-VGdnZ2d@giganews.com> <7825fb7c-3663-40b1-bea8-7586fd79560c@googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: shell01.theworld.com X-Trace: pcls7.std.com 1442268318 24719 192.74.137.71 (14 Sep 2015 22:05:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@TheWorld.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 22:05:18 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: nn/6.6.5 Xref: csiph.com alt.conspiracy:267514 sci.physics:521156 "Rocky" writes: >And we know for one thing for damn sure and that is nobody ever tried to >rent a hanger and put the airplanes back together like they did with Flight >800. See: > http://www.cnn.com/2014/07/14/us/twa-flight-800-five-things/ K00ktard, as you can see from the picture, Flight 800 was relatively few large pieces. It blew apart in the air and fell into the ocean. Flight 93 slammed into the ground at 500+ mph and except for the largest pieces, one ton pieces of the engines and a section of fuselage measuring 6'x7', just about all of the rest of the plane was obliterated into pieces ranging from notebook sized to 2". Kinda hard to piece that back together. >FYI about the radiation from the nukes that were detonated deep underground. >So nobody in the area had radiation burns from when those nukes were >detonated. Did you ever stop to think that the people that were in the path >of the blast were all vaporized so we have no idea how much radiation they >got. DUH. You mean like those firemen who barely escaped with the video of the tower shaking? Why weren't they vaporized? And where the hell was the million degree fireball that was vaporizing everything? And where was all the radiation it would have scattered into the air or the nonexistent mushroom cloud??? >What you really need to do is find out exactly how deep underground nukes >work in rock and stop making assumptions about them from nukes in dirt and >above ground nukes. OK? Well, first we have to figure out how many nukes there were and whether they were buried 77 feet underground or 77 miles underground since you keep changing your story. And of course, even if the radiation didn't vent somehow, you have to explain why there was no 5.5 magnitude earthquake (a 1kT is good for a 4.0), why there was no distinctive nuclear explosion signatures on any seismometers anywhere in the world, why there were no EMPs, why etc. etc. >Again, so many people say the following did not happen but photos prove it >did happen so why did it happen? Look at all that debris! 1.5 million tons of it!! It did happen!!! >And for those in the know, the haze is coming from the remains of the 3 deep >underground nukes and was also where the molten metal was found. So the nukes did vent and release all their radioactivity!! But why was no radioactivity detected??? At least I see that you are back to having 3 nukes. Until you change your mind again, anyway.