Path: csiph.com!xmission!news.alt.net!not-for-mail
From: owl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy,sci.physics,alt.free.newsservers,news.software.readers
Subject: Re: My code only does what _I_ want, not what "you" want.
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 19:33:53 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: O.W.L.
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <hgj3089itafjgi.f@rooftop.invalid>
References: <03c465f086c90ac720d1f3c4efda6f25@dizum.com>  <nd8ucp012bj@news7.newsguy.com>  <3382742e-7219-4aa1-93cd-d43a78cb6760@googlegroups.com>  <Jeff-Relf.Me@Mar.27{9.21A.Seattle.2016}>  <nd9ru3$751$1@dont-email.me>  <ng9ifb57orabua1vr6grldtg8k6m91djvq@4ax.com> <Jeff-Relf.Me@Mar.28{6.17A.Seattle.2016}>
NNTP-Posting-Host: boom.rooftop.invalid
User-Agent: tin/2.2.1-20140504 ("Tober an Righ") (UNIX) (Linux/3.16.0-4-amd64 (x86_64))
Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.advocacy:347866 sci.physics:566259 alt.free.newsservers:47710 news.software.readers:29255

In comp.os.linux.advocacy Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> wrote:
> MrChrisV wrote:
>> Relf claimed that his code was the "finest you'll ever see".
> 
> No.  I'd never say such a thing !
> My code only does what _I_ want, not what "you" want.
> 
>> "Testing is how you know if the code works or not, not compile-time
>> warnings."  -  Jeff Relf (the trolling fsckwit "Ezekiel" supports
>> Relf, on this issue)
> 
> Disabling certain warnings is best, I've found.
> Sometimes I want unreferenced variables, for example, just because.
> I'm using my code, so I know that it works the way I want.

Apparently you wanted it to post the same message twice.