Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Snit Newsgroups: talk.politics.guns,alt.checkmate,sci.physics Subject: Re: Climate Change and the Ocean: A Stark Message from the IPCC Date: 7 Jan 2019 02:50:29 GMT Lines: 32 Message-ID: References: <209agf-qjk.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <6egagf-hal.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <65lagf-hpl.ln1@mail.specsol.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net EEWixxxfNC3vA7J7b0rr1QM1Cj0w82OlZZYbVx6Em1HqEiNImd Cancel-Lock: sha1:TTu5l6UiO9p1uf3FoPEhfe4S1dw= sha1:pw0ztHjap9ZRxQPv2YP9w5u0XBI= User-Agent: NewsTap/5.3.3 (iPhone/iPod Touch) Xref: csiph.com talk.politics.guns:1154208 alt.checkmate:246123 sci.physics:722487 wrote: > In sci.physics Snit wrote: >> On 1/6/19 6:04 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> In sci.physics Snit wrote: >>>> On 1/6/19 5:26 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> In sci.physics Snit wrote: >>>>>> On 1/6/19 4:55 PM, % wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> stop having babies works too >>>>>> >>>>>> If we did that for 100 years then humanities problems would soon end. >>>>> >>>>> If we did that for 100 years there would be no humans. >>>>> >>>> >>>> There would still be six left. >>> >>> Not for very long. >>> >> >> No. Always six. > > More childish nonsense. > > After 100 years of no babies, the youngest people left would be 100, well > past childbearing age. > Then how do we maintain a population of six?