Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Snit Newsgroups: sci.physics,talk.politics.guns,alt.checkmate Subject: Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2019 12:55:09 -0700 Lines: 40 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net qHaCLFqJdtl1ozNJhk4X3AXg4vj57QQFp7qV5iG0u0dziArIxA Cancel-Lock: sha1:f2a0P7tFNa7EF5F9x8/OuQHMEl0= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Xref: csiph.com sci.physics:721924 talk.politics.guns:1152572 alt.checkmate:244256 On 1/1/19 12:43 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > On Tue, 1 Jan 2019 12:41:32 -0700, % wrote: > > >> LOL and he was properly informed > > Pay no attention to teh Snit. He's as > uninformed as they come. > Oh! Oh! Oh! By all means rub this in my face and show my recent comments where I show deep ignorance on topics. Seriously, do it. If you are right then I can learn. I *do* make mistakes. We all do. Heck, when I said the NRA writes the gun laws I was rightfully called out on it -- they heavily influence the laws (as I was able to show) but I cannot show where they WRITE them. Fair enough. I learned and I appreciate being corrected. So correct me. Point out where you think I am wrong. And if you cannot, well, then you will have learned something -- if you are open to it. My guess: you will not. You do not even believe it. Your real issue is your own insecurity with your views. You are bothered more by how well I back my views, not by how wrong I am. Your response will show insight as to if my guess is correct. Ball is in your court. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.