Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: vallor Newsgroups: sci.physics,talk.politics.guns,alt.checkmate Subject: Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Date: 14 Oct 2018 08:51:27 GMT Lines: 131 Message-ID: References: <1f-dnV10U6LsDiLGnZ2dnUU7-dudnZ2d@scnresearch.com> <97CdndYPtKtAMyLGnZ2dnUU7-YudnZ2d@scnresearch.com> <_-mdnQOQK6pxKCLGnZ2dnUU7-dGdnZ2d@scnresearch.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net 6jm+OjdWbGa5ZoW4LvPOxA4LoC95eAc3lfaNGJI6ENnnyM9YpM Cancel-Lock: sha1:594I6iXY5Gr+vl0R/Kloyq34GHA= X-Face: #IeFY=iD)&ZN!<}=Q`7Ox_$c8FW)GFXwE@nuP?M%wgfLyX13'FP4j1lhl|*X9$|ka|:VM%EV5aLIh yA]r*'0FkZBcmzB2j"(kd[{ Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAHlBMVEUNBAM7EQpyRybcYiaZgEXYc 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 User-Agent: Pan/0.146 (Hic habitat felicitas; 22c743d gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/pan.git) Xref: csiph.com sci.physics:707875 talk.politics.guns:1125975 alt.checkmate:214369 On Sat, 13 Oct 2018 23:08:26 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article 85.214.115.223>, Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com says... > > > >> vallor wrote in news:g2em21F5knqU2 >> @mid.individual.net: >> >> > On Sat, 13 Oct 2018 07:19:51 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >> > >> >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts >> by >> >> Checkmate! In article > >> 85.214.115.223>, Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com says... >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> pandora wrote in news:_-mdnQOQK6pxKCLGnZ2dnUU7- >> >>> dGdnZ2d@scnresearch.com: >> >>> >> >>> > On Thu, 11 Oct 2018 14:32:52 -0600, Lunar Opticfibre wrote: >> >>> > >> >>> >> On 10/11/2018 2:13 PM, pandora wrote: >> >>> >>> On Thu, 11 Oct 2018 19:44:07 +0000, Nadegda wrote: >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, >> snowflakes, >> >>> >>>> melt! >> >>> >>>> On Thu, 11 Oct 2018 15:34:10 -0400, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. >> wrote: >> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>>>> On Thu, 11 Oct 2018 13:16:17 -0500, pandora >> >>> >>>>> >> >>> wrote: >> >>> >>>>> >> >>> >>>>>> On Thu, 11 Oct 2018 13:07:02 -0400, kensi wrote: >> >>> >>>>>> >> >>> >>>>>>> On 10/11/2018 12:45 PM, stinky puddles piddled: >> >>> >>>>>>>> What's happened to American womanhood? >> >>> >>>>>>> >> >>> >>>>>>> We finally stopped being subservient and began demanding >> >>> >>>>>>> respect >> >>> as >> >>> >>>>>>> equals. And it really sticks in your craw that we're >> >>> >>>>>>> gaining traction. >> >>> >>>>>> >> >>> >>>>>> It makes one wonder what *they* are afraid of. >> >>> >>>>> >> >>> >>>>> You don't know? How about false and ludicrous rape >> >>> >>>>> accusations >> >>> like >> >>> >>>>> the Bimbo Ford bitch did to Kavanaugh? >> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>>> What makes you think it's "false and ludicrous"? What Blasey >> Ford >> >>> >>>> described is, unfortunately, an all too common thing. :( >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> The only thing that was proven was that the Senate Judiciary >> >>> Committee >> >>> >>> didn't believe her. However, she had the right to accuse and >> have >> >>> >>> it investigated as do all accusers. >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> I also find it ludicrous that several were overjoyed at Cosby's >> >>> >>> being judged guilty and sentenced to prison from similar >> >>> >>> accusations. A double standard perhaps? Or......? >> >>> >> >> >>> >> Many people had it in their gut feeling that Cosby was guilty. >> Some >> >>> >> guys said he was caught a few times and girls said so, such that >> it >> >>> was >> >>> >> a good feeling for them when he was confirmed as guilty. They >> >>> >> watched enough television that a positive feeling emerged. Does >> >>> >> that make >> >>> more >> >>> >> sense? >> >>> > >> >>> > Quite possibly or simply that he is black. >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> The stupid is strong in you. >> >> >> >> Apparently, a white guy merely accused of sexual misconduct with >> >> zero proof should be locked up, but a black guy actually found >> >> guilty of decades of sexual abuse should be set free because he's >> >> black... >> > >> > That's not what she said. >> > >> > She said that the white power types are *gleeful* that he *went to >> jail* >> > because Cosby is black. >> > >> > And the fact that you continue to ignore that fact, even after she >> > corrected you on it, shows your real agenda -- as well as gerg's. >> > >> > >> Who the fuck was glad to see Cosby convicted and jailed? I thought it >> was just a horrible disappointment. That a man had acted in such a way >> after preaching about morality. Disgusting. > > Cosby jumped all over former co-star Lisa Bonet for doing a nude scene > in "Angel Heart" with Mickey Rourk. I don't know of anybody who was > happy about any of what happened with Cosby, and I don't even know why > Pandora thought that anybody was "gleeful" over Cosby going to prison > because he's black... nobody in here ever said anything like that. > > All I was trying to do is draw a distinction between judging someone as > guilty based on nothing but an unproven allegation, and someone who > apparently WAS guilty after actually having the benefit of a trial > first. > After making that point, all of a sudden race gets thrown into the > picture from out of the blue, which had exactly nothing to do with the > conversation. Then some clueless interloper rides in on his white horse > and makes an ass of himself. Except, you are sloooowly backpedaling, having realized your original claim was...imprecise. > > Oh... and I'm a backstabber... I'd explain what you did wrong, but then you'd bitch about me white- knighting again. -- -v