Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: vallor Newsgroups: sci.physics,talk.politics.guns,alt.checkmate Subject: Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Date: 14 Oct 2018 07:31:03 GMT Lines: 134 Message-ID: References: <1f-dnV10U6LsDiLGnZ2dnUU7-dudnZ2d@scnresearch.com> <97CdndYPtKtAMyLGnZ2dnUU7-YudnZ2d@scnresearch.com> <_-mdnQOQK6pxKCLGnZ2dnUU7-dGdnZ2d@scnresearch.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net h9wpG/IejfTaeAjXCwVmPQFXhEMT0dki6FMSStFlaIOdmRQuAX Cancel-Lock: sha1:EMWnnOHd+QZ+HmnQ9cfGPScK1mI= X-Face: #IeFY=iD)&ZN!<}=Q`7Ox_$c8FW)GFXwE@nuP?M%wgfLyX13'FP4j1lhl|*X9$|ka|:VM%EV5aLIh yA]r*'0FkZBcmzB2j"(kd[{ Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAHlBMVEUNBAM7EQpyRybcYiaZgEXYc 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 User-Agent: Pan/0.146 (Hic habitat felicitas; 22c743d gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/pan.git) Xref: csiph.com sci.physics:707870 talk.politics.guns:1125966 alt.checkmate:214358 On Sat, 13 Oct 2018 12:28:58 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article , > vallor@cultnix.org says... > > > >> On Sat, 13 Oct 2018 07:19:51 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts >> > by Checkmate! In article > > 85.214.115.223>, Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com says... >> > >> > >> > >> >> pandora wrote in news:_-mdnQOQK6pxKCLGnZ2dnUU7- >> >> dGdnZ2d@scnresearch.com: >> >> >> >> > On Thu, 11 Oct 2018 14:32:52 -0600, Lunar Opticfibre wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> On 10/11/2018 2:13 PM, pandora wrote: >> >> >>> On Thu, 11 Oct 2018 19:44:07 +0000, Nadegda wrote: >> >> >>> >> >> >>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, >> >> >>>> snowflakes, >> >> >>>> melt! >> >> >>>> On Thu, 11 Oct 2018 15:34:10 -0400, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. >> >> >>>> wrote: >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>>> On Thu, 11 Oct 2018 13:16:17 -0500, pandora >> >> wrote: >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>>> On Thu, 11 Oct 2018 13:07:02 -0400, kensi wrote: >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>> On 10/11/2018 12:45 PM, stinky puddles piddled: >> >> >>>>>>>> What's happened to American womanhood? >> >> >>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>> We finally stopped being subservient and began demanding >> >> >>>>>>> respect >> >> as >> >> >>>>>>> equals. And it really sticks in your craw that we're gaining >> >> >>>>>>> traction. >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> It makes one wonder what *they* are afraid of. >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> You don't know? How about false and ludicrous rape >> >> >>>>> accusations >> >> like >> >> >>>>> the Bimbo Ford bitch did to Kavanaugh? >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> What makes you think it's "false and ludicrous"? What Blasey >> >> >>>> Ford described is, unfortunately, an all too common thing. :( >> >> >>> >> >> >>> The only thing that was proven was that the Senate Judiciary >> >> Committee >> >> >>> didn't believe her. However, she had the right to accuse and >> >> >>> have it investigated as do all accusers. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> I also find it ludicrous that several were overjoyed at Cosby's >> >> >>> being judged guilty and sentenced to prison from similar >> >> >>> accusations. A double standard perhaps? Or......? >> >> >> >> >> >> Many people had it in their gut feeling that Cosby was guilty. >> >> >> Some guys said he was caught a few times and girls said so, such >> >> >> that it >> >> was >> >> >> a good feeling for them when he was confirmed as guilty. They >> >> >> watched enough television that a positive feeling emerged. Does >> >> >> that make >> >> more >> >> >> sense? >> >> > >> >> > Quite possibly or simply that he is black. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> The stupid is strong in you. >> > >> > Apparently, a white guy merely accused of sexual misconduct with zero >> > proof should be locked up, but a black guy actually found guilty of >> > decades of sexual abuse should be set free because he's black... >> >> That's not what she said. > > That's certainly what she strongly implied. > >> She said that the white power types are *gleeful* that he *went to >> jail* >> because Cosby is black. >> >> And the fact that you continue to ignore that fact, even after she >> corrected you on it, shows your real agenda -- as well as gerg's. > > The fact that you assume that I, or anyone else who hasn't specifically > stated so, is "gleeful" because a black man went to prison for decades > of sexual abuse involving numerous victims, is indicative of your own > addled thinking. I've never entertained any thoughts that it makes any > fucking difference what color Bill Cosby is. Harvey Weinstein is white, > and will soon be joining him, and I have no problem with that either. > How did this suddenly become the issue in question, when it had nothing > to do with the issue I was discussing? > > My issue is that Pandora and a few other biased Libtards in here can't > see the difference between Kavanaugh being accused of sexual misconduct > with absolutely NO evidence whatsoever, and someone who was convicted > with tons of evidence and went to prison. We don't imprison people > simply because some mentally afflicted individual thinks she was abused > by the person she accused, but can offer no proof whatsoever. > > When I tried to make that distinction, then the issue became "maybe (he > was convicted) just because he was black." That's obscuring the > original issue with a new one... so is an innocent white man presumed > guilty with no corroborating evidence worse than a guilty man in prison > who happens to be black? Was Cosby treated unfairly by the legal system > because he's black, or are certain liberals treating an innocent man > unfairly because he's white? I see your point, and you make a good one. However, I still don't think it's fair to nail someone to the wall for something they didn't say -- or in the case of a misunderstanding, after they've clarified what they were talking about. I know it's unheard of nowadays on the USENET, but a little charity would have gone a long way. > If you're going to assume the role of Arbiter of Truth and Reason in > here, make sure you understand what the fuck you're talking about, > because you obviously don't. Are you kidding me? I couldn't be an Arbiter of Anything -- this is a free-for-all in here. -- -v