Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Sylvia Else Newsgroups: sci.physics Subject: Re: The Quark Religion Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2018 08:44:14 +1000 Lines: 104 Message-ID: References: <3cbef956-1ce6-4e30-9e6e-f0b67f4399bf@googlegroups.com> <88c3748a-621e-446f-bc7b-ee39c827e78a@googlegroups.com> <1701fe0f-2b28-4960-9b65-5f1e1b8f2876@googlegroups.com> <59ca0194-d2f4-41b5-84ec-315a3e3468c4@googlegroups.com> <697911ce-de83-445b-abbf-5cf52704fbee@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net cVPlYR3WaiTlyFMr7XSdag5V35qb0Wrc1mwtF8ZyY9dncdldUO Cancel-Lock: sha1:XNgMGwxBgtuDe0Y2kMFa2m4XW40= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1 In-Reply-To: <697911ce-de83-445b-abbf-5cf52704fbee@googlegroups.com> Content-Language: en-US Xref: csiph.com sci.physics:700899 On 2/09/2018 11:49 PM, poraty149@gmail.com wrote: > On Sunday, September 2, 2018 at 12:55:02 PM UTC+3, Sylvia Else wrote: >> On 2/09/2018 7:14 PM, poraty149@gmail.com wrote: >>> On Sunday, September 2, 2018 at 2:21:15 AM UTC+3, Sylvia Else wrote: >>>> On 1/09/2018 8:31 PM, poraty149@gmail.com wrote: >>>>> On Saturday, September 1, 2018 at 12:36:38 PM UTC+3, Sylvia Else wrote: >>>>>> On 1/09/2018 7:29 PM, poraty149@gmail.com wrote: >>>>>>> On Saturday, September 1, 2018 at 9:39:10 AM UTC+3, Sylvia Else wrote: >>>>>>>> On 28/08/2018 7:09 PM, alal65536@gmail.com wrote: >>>>>>>>> How many followers does it have? Quarks are not science/physics. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> What about electrons, protons, neutrons? Are they science/physics? If >>>>>>>> so, how do they differ from quarks? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Sylvia. >>>>>>> ====================== >>>>>>> i will tell you how >>>>>>> electrons protons differ from quarks >>>>>>> >>>>>>> first of all >>>>>>> quarks are like say 2 fansy hats on your head >>>>>>> while you have hands and legs etc >>>>>>> how about it ?? >>>>>> >>>>>> That doesn't say much. >>>>>> >>>>>> People may feel familiar with electrons because they've heard the term >>>>>> all their lives. If so, that feeling is a delusion. An electron is a >>>>>> theory in physics as much as is a quark. At most, experimental >>>>>> verifications of the theory are a bit more accessible in the case of the >>>>>> electron, since particle accelerators are not required. >>>>>> >>>>>> Sylvia. >>>>> ====================== >>>>> 3 quarks are supposed to build say the proton >>>>> but what can you do >>>>> while >>>>> the mass of 3 quaks is something like >>>>> 90 percent of proton mass >>>>> so >>>>> where is the other 10 percent of mass ?? >>>> >>>> It's the binding energy. We see the same in nuclear fission. See >>> >>>> >>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_binding_energy >>> ============================= >>> OPPA SILVIA >>> please teach me something about binding energies >>> do you think i know something about binding energies ? >>> is not >>> see >>> http://sites.google.com/site/theyporatmodel/an-abstact >>> >>> while you see it and learn a bit of it >>> you can get some idea whether i know somethning about >>> or not >>> in my book (not only the abstract i give a detailed >>> list table of how and where are all the binding energies are! >>> or else >>> i could not do a bit of that modelo(r even start it >>> so >>> let me tell you that in the proton or neutron >>> binding energies are about maximum 0.01 AMU >>> not more >>> so 3 times 0.1 =0.3 amu (as binding energy >>> so ?? >>> does that can explain the missing mass >>> of 3 quarks ?/!! >>> btw >>> if you will dead intentively what i wroth >>> there even in that abstract >>> i mentioned there the 'magic figure 3 >>> that is common in those structures !!! >>> BTW >>> are you German? if yes >>> i could have a suggestion to you ... >>> -=== >>> TIA >>> Y.Porat >>> ================= >>> >> >> I really don't know what you know or don't know, other than you have no >> formatting skills. >> >> Either that or you deliberately make your missives hard to read for some >> unfathomable reason. >> >> Sylvia. > ================ > SYLVIA > i m not a native english speaker > i type quickly and don t dwell on spelling > the cotence is important to me > ====== > Y.P > ================ > I didn't mention spelling. The issue was formatting. Even in your native language, I doubt it is normal to break lines at random positions. Sylvia.