Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address>
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Subject: Re: WHAT IS MORE BASIC ? ! - ENERGY - OR MASS ??
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2018 08:41:29 +1000
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <fv378pF41o9U1@mid.individual.net>
References: <2b189f54-b41e-4f11-8ddd-b04ac072595a@googlegroups.com> <5700048b-2a31-466e-92e5-bbcbfdf39539@googlegroups.com> <9d987166-593e-4242-84c7-31fa1bce141a@googlegroups.com> <pmfhpp$3kf$1@gioia.aioe.org> <ef1ed9e3-cff1-4fb2-a7ba-5ec2bb333c2e@googlegroups.com> <fv1qgdFpkc1U1@mid.individual.net> <21934e92-2ed8-4cbe-8303-14640623a715@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net buhTvpEZ7+5GvyyWS2/6NQh/cGaNyoFvutzN5lH8bER/hqQ6XL
Cancel-Lock: sha1:RD7Tj4tDZS2aerYlK/pM7FVsepA=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1
In-Reply-To: <21934e92-2ed8-4cbe-8303-14640623a715@googlegroups.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Xref: csiph.com sci.physics:700897

On 2/09/2018 11:26 PM, poraty149@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sunday, September 2, 2018 at 12:57:36 PM UTC+3, Sylvia Else wrote:
>> On 2/09/2018 7:28 PM, poraty149@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>> potential energy ??
>>> (:-)
>>> it has no mass?
>>
>> What makes you think that?
>>
>> Sylvia.
> ===============
> sorry
> i don t understand your question

The question is what makes you think that potential energy has no mass?

If it didn't, then one could construct a free-energy machine.

Sylvia.