Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Thomas Heger Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,alt.astronomy Subject: Re: Deep Thought Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2018 11:42:28 +0200 Lines: 61 Message-ID: References: <5B54F677.2732@ix.netcom.com> <2c4e096f-096b-51e5-690c-039b1b01dbbe@PointedEars.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net jBG4Jd4eESN4Uart6d1Z1gK+rWe7sUrtQHk1z1b+OXnFGy7VUu Cancel-Lock: sha1:Shi/Yvw6ZJdwKIggz9DoRdBHBA8= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Xref: csiph.com rec.arts.sf.written:495429 sci.physics:695335 sci.physics.relativity:465413 alt.astronomy:300444 Am 24.07.2018 um 06:45 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson: > On 7/23/2018 9:08 AM, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: >> Thomas Heger wrote: >>> Am 22.07.2018 um 23:26 schrieb The Starmaker: >>>> i always thought the earth >>>> was at the center >>>>    of the universe.. >>>> but i just had a >>>> deep thought! >>>> >>>> I AM THE CENTER OF THE UNIVERSE!!!! >>> >>> What we call 'universe' is not that universal. Actually it is what is >>> called in relativity 'past light cone'. >> >> No, it is not.  That is just your fantasy, as you have be told before. >> >> For example, if a star goes supernova but due to universal expansion the >> distance of it to me increases so fast that I will never observe it (i.e. >> the supernova is or becomes a spacelike-separated event), the star and >> its >> remnants are *still* a part of my/the universe. >> > > > I have always had a little feeling that the big bang might be nothing > more than a local hyper massive explosion contained within a much larger > universe. Perhaps a cluster of ultra massive black holes all finally > merged together. Wrt a larger universe, the big bang could be a single > pixel in the following rendering: > > http://www.fractalforums.com/index.php?action=gallery;sa=view;id=17379 > > http://www.fractalforums.com/index.php?action=gallery;sa=view;id=17386 > (a zoom...) > > Nice pictures! I think, the universe is actually a very large fractal and our little world is nothing but a 'chapter' in a much larger story. To understand the idea of big bang, you need to think about the underlying axioms of big-bang theory (which are - of course - wrong). Big-bang is based on a single universal time-line, that starts at the event called big-bang and ends (for instance) here.# This cannot possibly be true. One reason: the universe does not look like an expanding two-dimensional sphere. Better solution: there are multiple timelines possible and to any such 'axis of time' belongs a different 'time domaine' which has its own space. Such a space could pop out of nowhere and subsequently build a new 'universe'. But that 'universe' is just a local impression and not universal at all. TH