Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Trevor Wilson Newsgroups: sci.physics Subject: Re: Climate Change Causes More Volcano Eruptions. Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2018 19:28:45 +1000 Lines: 50 Message-ID: References: <2c45b7f5-9ac5-479e-8b79-a889714a9af5@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net xpqpa24Xfk6qU70XV+OaqQILHMDZpierwe1jE6QUO6QcSS7xCI Cancel-Lock: sha1:DrW4Cz74hlB/tu+jNE29k62/Tvk= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 180609-0, 09/06/2018), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Xref: csiph.com sci.physics:689629 On 9/06/2018 4:15 PM, Wally W. wrote: > On Sat, 9 Jun 2018 15:34:15 +1000, Trevor Wilson wrote: > >> On 8/06/2018 6:43 AM, benj wrote: >>> On 6/7/2018 2:35 PM, reber G=emc^2 wrote: >>>> On Tuesday, June 5, 2018 at 5:23:19 AM UTC-7, benj wrote: >>>>> Science already has proved that the Hawaiian lave eruptions are caused >>>>> by climate change but now it's worse than scientists thought! >>>>> >>>>> Another "deadly" volcano goes off in Guatemala! >>>>> >>>>> https://www.space.com/40794-fuego-volcano-eruption-satellite-photos.html >>>> >>>> Reality is volcanoes can create weather change.Bert >>>> >>> And Climate change can create volcanic eruptions! That is a given. >> >> **Cite your peer-reviewed science to support your insane claim. > > Can you use Google? **Sure. Can you? Can benj? Obviously not. > > There is no shortage of FUD like this: > > https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/get-ready-for-more-volcanic-eruptions-as-the-planet-warms/ > > https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/11/171123095405.htm > > https://www.express.co.uk/news/science/946883/volcano-eruption-global-warming-climate-change-melting-ice-caps-mount-meager > > http://www.businessinsider.com/volcano-eruptions-increase-japan-philippines-warming-climate-glacial-retreat-2018-1 > > ... b .. bu ... but ... those aren't peer reviewed. **Then why would you imagine I am interested in a non peer-reviewed scientific article. > > Some here seem to have lost respect for them, but do you want to call > Scientific American insane? **Just benj. -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au