Path: csiph.com!xmission!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!news.albasani.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Snit Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy,sci.physics,alt.checkmate,talk.politics.guns Subject: Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Date: 3 Jun 2018 00:47:03 GMT Lines: 45 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net L9BFA+ZIACTZtz6oQmQUjgVA6GcXP5Qfy8Y4zbDAlqIXw/xy2M Cancel-Lock: sha1:FYPvevkU6Hpq65lL4/qoW91loAk= sha1:4DWsqdnlPlPmZROw3CVRI/vjHGs= User-Agent: NewsTap/5.3.1 (iPhone/iPod Touch) Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.advocacy:453427 sci.physics:688378 alt.checkmate:170565 talk.politics.guns:1090242 Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: > On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 13:29:48 -0700, Snit > wrote: > >> On 6/2/18 1:27 PM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>> On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 10:57:54 -0700, Snit >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 6/2/18 10:38 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>> On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 10:14:41 -0700, Snit >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 6/2/18 6:27 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >>>>>>>> A well regulated Militia [ no comma ] >>>>>>>> being necessary to the security of a free State, ... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Or, more clearly: " For The State's Militia, ... " >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Clearly, no "Militia" should include depressed gunmen >>>>>>> slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. >>>>>>> >>>>>> And when stating "no comma", keep in mind there were something like >>>>>> seven different versions of the second amendment with different commas >>>>>> and capitalization. >>>>> >>>>> Cool- how many of the say "The right of the state"???? >>>>> >>>> I do not think that phrase is in the constitution >>> >>> Correct. >>> >> Are you just looking for specific phrases or are you trying to get to a >> point? I suspect you are trying to say that since that phrase is not >> there this means the concept of what the states can do (what they have >> rights to do) is not there. Is that correct? If not did you have a >> broader point? > > No, you're not even close. > > It's the people's right, not the militia's right, not the state's > right, not the feds' right. > That is your unsupported opinion. Fair enough.