Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Snit Newsgroups: sci.physics,comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.checkmate,talk.politics.guns Subject: Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2018 00:16:38 -0700 Lines: 22 Message-ID: References: <4LMPC.193817$nq5.73490@fx36.iad> <84VPC.228962$yc1.187480@fx40.iad> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net FXtGEUA1yFY281RRQsYULQnETeEGrHVFQxAdM+zRsKLgqxdJF0 Cancel-Lock: sha1:12j73X3BpQAdKv5Rl5nDR9yMVtk= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Xref: csiph.com sci.physics:688267 comp.os.linux.advocacy:453249 alt.checkmate:170307 talk.politics.guns:1089998 On 6/1/18 11:39 PM, max headroom wrote: > >> Here is what you seem to want to refute but cannot: >> https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/antonin-scalia-was-wrong-about-the-meaning-of-bear-arms/2018/05/21/9243ac66-5d11-11e8-b2b8-08a538d9dbd6_story.html > I just did. > > If you want to know what the Founding Fathers meant, read*their* words. When did the founding fathers use the words "bear arms" except in the constitution? Let me guess: You will now quote them saying things OTHER than that. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.