Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Snit Newsgroups: sci.physics,comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.checkmate,talk.politics.guns Subject: Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2018 20:32:25 -0700 Lines: 56 Message-ID: References: <4LMPC.193817$nq5.73490@fx36.iad> <6do2hd5r2qhecatrtqfo403pju3prjdrg5@4ax.com> <9vn3hd9cli0mqgcqjd3c9kin2e5ckq44ck@4ax.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net Kdk5bZXWrApw2ueLheNHkQVbElHwiu8z84Tie7XXj+vT1sHfu/ Cancel-Lock: sha1:DRP2sZyJeL2OF1/YGkSy7crGiak= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Xref: csiph.com sci.physics:688215 comp.os.linux.advocacy:453182 alt.checkmate:170243 talk.politics.guns:1089892 On 6/1/18 8:09 PM, Scout wrote: > > > "Snit" wrote in message > news:fne75kFq86rU2@mid.individual.net... >> On 6/1/18 5:09 PM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>> On Fri, 1 Jun 2018 12:30:03 -0700, Snit >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 6/1/18 11:59 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>> >>>>> Hmmmmm. Yet it doesn't define militia, as you previously maintained. >>>> >>>> It, along with plenty of other evidence, shows how the phrase "bear >>>> arms" and the concept of a militia was seen. >>> >>> Thanks for agreeing that it doesn't "define a militia." >>> >>>>>> of one, both you and I have quoted. >>>>>> >>>>>> Now one might say all of what it said is not required... but the >>>>>> second >>>>>> amendment makes no suggestion of anything otherwise. >>>>> >>>>> Well of course it does. If you read it. >>>> >>>> I have... and also shown the context for the meaning, which you ignore. >>> >>> No, it's important to have a militia. But it doesn't limit the right >>> to a militia. >>> >>> If it did, it would say, "Right of the states." >>> >>> It doesn't. >>> >> Nobody said it used those words. Not sure what you are arguing against. > > Then we still have the right of the people and the people can still keep > and bear arms without any need to be involved with any militia > whatsoever. Because militia involvement doesn't define who is one of the > people. Sounds like you are using the phrase "bear arms" to mean to defend yourself personally... a non-standard form. Or do you mean it in a different way than that? -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.