Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Trevor Wilson Newsgroups: sci.physics,talk.politics.guns,alt.checkmate Subject: Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Date: Thu, 24 May 2018 09:35:02 +1000 Lines: 85 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net r4gEt83t9u8kkLJ/SHxoNgkJbLfdq9B3IbUEvMLlKfmGeolPca Cancel-Lock: sha1:6VxEEf9OmEaZ6HfGs5X4MqJpj4U= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 180522-4, 23/05/2018), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Xref: csiph.com sci.physics:686843 talk.politics.guns:1087919 alt.checkmate:167572 On 23/05/2018 5:03 PM, Scout wrote: > > > "Trevor Wilson" wrote in message > news:fmkftmF1hotU1@mid.individual.net... >> On 23/05/2018 1:58 PM, Scout wrote: >>> >>> >>> "Trevor Wilson" wrote in message >>> news:fmk55aFtr6kU2@mid.individual.net... >>>> On 23/05/2018 1:18 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> "Trevor Wilson" wrote in message >>>>> news:fmjt7eFs9h6U1@mid.individual.net... >>>>>> On 10/05/2018 10:26 AM, Scout wrote: >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > "kensi" wrote in message >>>>>> news:pcusd6$vnd$1@gioia.aioe.org... >>>>>> >> On 5/9/2018 7:57 AM, Wally W. wrote: >>>>>> >>> On Wed, 9 May 2018 06:52:40 -0400, kensi wrote: >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>>> In 2013, atmospheric carbon dioxide broke 400 parts per million >>>>>> for the >>>>>> >>>> first time in human history. Just a year later, atmospheric >>>>>> >>>> carbon >>>>>> >>>> dioxide averaged that for an entire month. And now? >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>> ... we found that breaking the 400 ppm "limit" wasn't a problem. >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>> No tipping point happened, the sky didn't fall, and we're >>>>>> still >>> here. >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> 400ppm doesn't result in *instant* catastrophe. But your grandkids >>>>>> are likely going to grow up without Manhattan as part of their >>>>>> world. Among other things. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > You say that like it would be a bad thing..... >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Meanwhile.....according to your side Miami is already suppose to be >>>>>> underwater..... >>>>>> >>>>>> **Really? Who stated that? >>>>> >>>>> You’re really new to the whole climate change issue aren't you? >>>> >>>> **It seems you didn't understand the question: >>>> >>>> Who stated it? >>> >>> Excuse me, but do I look like your personal reference library? >> >> **YOU made the claim. YOU need to back your claim. Or admit it was >> bullshit. >> >>> >>> When you can back up your shit...then maybe I might deem it necessary >>> to more with mine. >> >> **I have backed my claims with evidence. You back yours with nothing. >> >>> >>> Until then.....you're way behind on backing up your bullshit. Then >>> when you 'do' you offer links that don't take you to where the >>> support actually is, but you claim that it's buried in there >>> somewhere, even though you seem utterly unable to find it yourself. >> >> **Read the cite, BEFORE you make a complete idiot of yourself. >> Clearly, you have failed to read it. > > What you claim is in there isn't, and you can't show otherwise or you > would have already done so. **Already done. Read the cite. > > Heck, I bet you haven't even read your own cite. **You'd lose that bet. Read the cite. IN FULL. -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au