Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Trevor Wilson Newsgroups: sci.physics Subject: Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 08:23:21 +1000 Lines: 94 Message-ID: References: <2718935.687JKscXgg@PointedEars.de> <0belcd13hc6v6lvkl0huju5ddvvk8a1crc@4ax.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net XIt3ng9eIUYqJdsSC9ObJAFNzmddQlVfPRWLSLvSqEDPcg13CZ Cancel-Lock: sha1:02muTEe5eXzyZPI87Q/YhDamV7A= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 180409-2, 10/04/2018), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Xref: csiph.com sci.physics:680525 On 10/04/2018 8:13 AM, Sergio wrote: > On 4/9/2018 4:36 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >> On 10/04/2018 2:52 AM, Sergio wrote: >>> On 4/8/2018 8:40 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>> On 9/04/2018 11:12 AM, Lofty Goat wrote: >>>>> On Mon, 9 Apr 2018 09:57:03 +1000, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> 'benj' claims to have many science degrees and yet, manages to come >>>>>> out with the insane statement referenced above. >>>>> >>>>> Ben is, as I recall, a retired engineer.  One of his favorite indoor >>>>> sports is posting nonsense to the physics groups so he can watch the >>>>> serious posters foam at the mouth.  Although neither crazy nor stupid, >>>>> he does have a pretty weird sense of humor. >>>>> >>>> >>>> **I can only judge a person >>> >>> You go around judging people on the internet by what they post on USENET >>> ??    You a either a moron, or shallow thinker (you choose). >>> >>> >>>> by their words and deeds. Judged by his >>>> words, benj is a moron. >>> >>> but Trevor, you already judged yourself as the supremiest person, who >>> holds superior wisdom over all others. >> >> **Did I? Got a cite for that? I'll wait while you find it. > > you have a website dedicated to yourself. > >> >>> >>> benj openly questions the validity of scientific conclusions by contract >>> journalists who have little to no credentials. Like almost all links >>> kensi posts, and most of yours. >> >> **Nope. benj is a moron, who wouldn't know real science from Breitbart. >> Worse, benj scurries away from discussions that exceed his ability to >> comprehend. >> > > I am fining you 15 cents for using "scurries" as that word is too old. > scurries ? First recorded in 1800-10; extracted from hurry-scurry. > > do you read Scientific American for your Science ? (shameful) **Along with Nature, Science and other sources, yes. You need to acquire your scientific information from sources other than Breitbart and Newsweek. > > >>> >>> you kesni pupa, Nads all respond with twists and turns and change the >>> subject, correct engrlish, without being able to understand the orgional >>> data sets, the math needed, nor the specific computer models, analysis >>> of error sources, and so on. >> >> **Says the person who cites right wing news sites and Anthony Watts >> instead of real science. This would be a pot, kettle, black moment. > > you prefer CNN ? **Nope. Don't watch/read it. MSNBC ? **Nope. Don't watch/read it. RT ? **Dunno what that is. FB ? **Dunno what that is. Google Non-Fake News ? **No need. Again, you need to read other sources other than Breitbart, Fox and Newsweek. Nature and Science would be excellent places to start. -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au