Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com Newsgroups: sci.space.policy,sci.physics,rec.arts.sf.science Subject: Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2016 00:11:26 -0000 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 22 Sender: Jim Pennino Message-ID: References: <57eacb75$0$43811$c3e8da3$5e5e430d@news.astraweb.com> <57fdbe2c$0$34569$c3e8da3$dbd57e7@news.astraweb.com> Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="4fb4e9c3fa56f7be55b934b25f7ef873"; logging-data="5115"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/vj1Y+p8LMvXnpRXxQx/zZ" User-Agent: tin/2.2.1-20140504 ("Tober an Righ") (UNIX) (SunOS/5.10 (i86pc)) Cancel-Lock: sha1:GwgDM/TqvsJSU9UPSYGvpMAXoDU= Xref: csiph.com sci.space.policy:58307 sci.physics:600797 rec.arts.sf.science:25203 In sci.physics Jeff Findley wrote: > In article , invalid@invalid.com says... >> >> there may not be any coal or oil on Mars if no huge plants growing in >> its past like on earth. "=> no fuel on Mars" > > So you use solar and nuclear power. And if fusion power ever becomes > practical, you use that too. Just because we're dependant on fossil > fuels here on earth doesn't mean a Mars colony needs to be! > > Jeff To get the equivalent of a small 50 MW nuclear reactor on Mars, you would need over a million square meters of solar panels which only work during the day. If we had dilithium reactors, warp drive, replicators, and transporters the problem would be trivial. -- Jim Pennino