Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Thomas Heger Newsgroups: alt.atheism,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: Atheism is Witchcraft Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 06:33:29 +0200 Lines: 154 Message-ID: References: <57dc95d2$0$43888$c3e8da3$5e5e430d@news.astraweb.com> <4qlrtbtefm6jecslqd5c0maig2505eij9f@4ax.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net Y44QJGbHkfxekQD25LM5OgYyb96z8wDS1TTEKpDV68ztuNVzip Cancel-Lock: sha1:nIQ7n3ZWsyzXsoxFciLj6vTKFpg= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0 In-Reply-To: Xref: csiph.com alt.atheism:2175237 sci.physics:598904 sci.physics.relativity:394336 Am 18.09.2016 21:06, schrieb Attila <: > On Sun, 18 Sep 2016 20:14:35 +0200, Thomas Heger in > alt.atheism with message-id wrote: > >> Am 18.09.2016 08:24, schrieb Jeanne Douglas: >> >>>> From the theoretical side Nazis had roots in certain ideologies and ideas. >>>> >>>> The ideas stem from theoreticians like Arthur de Gobineau, who himself >>>> based his ideas on Darwin. >>>> >>>> And Darwin was apparently supported by (British) aristocracy, the Guilds >>>> and the bankers. >>>> >>>> Apparently this was according to plan and to something called an 'agenda'. >>>> >>>> And this agenda had not begun in the 19th century, nor had it ended in >>>> the 20th. >>>> >>>> But apparently the Nazis and their wars were just a piece in a larger >>>> puzzle. >>>> >>>> It is now essential to identify this agenda, to prevent its perpetrators >>>> from further destruction. >>>> >>>> The method is called 'reverse engineering'. This means, that unknown >>>> systems are reinvented from what is known about them. >>>> >>>> If simulation and real system behave somehow similar, the real system >>>> can be modelled with a simulation. That would make it possible to find >>>> out, who did what in these evil plans. >>> >>> >>> >>> And yet again you fail to provide even the slightest evidence that any >>> of this had anything to do with Darwin. >>> >> >> Ok, actually I don't know, what Darwin had in mind. >> >> But Darwin as a person is not as interesting and of such political >> importance as Naziism. >> >> TH > > Darwin is much more interesting and influential than a bunch of > psychopaths. > Darwinism is a central part of Naziism (the other is socialism). The English word for Naziism is 'Eugenics'. The head of the Eugenics society was Julian Huxley. Head of the Fabian socialists was Bertrand Russel. Aldous Huxley and Bertrand Russel were both members of the secret society 'The apostles' of Cambridge, together with Ludwig Wittgenstein. This is interesting, since Wittgenstein was at the same school and of the same age as Hitler and also gay. Most likely they have known each other and were 'friends'. Now Aldous Huxley and Adolf Hitler share this 'A. H.' initials. So kind of 'joke' would be possible, if a spy needs a false identity. The real identity of that spy was (in my eyes) Noel Trevenen Huxley. He got a false beard and the hair painted. He started his training in Bavaria in the house of Isolde Beidler, who was the daughter of Richard Wagner. (Hitler actually lived officially at Prinzregentenplatz 16 in Munich.) The connection to Darwin was Thomas Huxley ('Darwins Bulldog'), grandfather of the Huxley brothers. The connection to the Wagner family was Lord Redescale. This was the real father of Clementine Hozier (Churchill's wife) and the grandfather of Unity Midfort (Hitler's girlfriend). Son in Law of Richard Wagner was Houston Steward Chamberlain. He was the 'hub' of Bavarian Naziism and allegedly the real author of 'My Struggle'. Forewords to his pamphlet wrote said Lord Redescale, who also paid for printing. He also translated the books into English. Then we have Marjorie Winifried Williams (aka Winifried Wagner), who was a close friend of Adolf Hitler. Her husband was the gay son of Richard Wagner. So we would need to search for a candidate for the fatherhood of her kids. And we don't need to search very far, since e.g. Friedelind looks quite similar to Winifried's friend. Lord Redescale was the owner of a gold-mine in Swastika, Canada. This had as logo the real Nazi swastika (the inverted Hindu wheel of life), what is actually a death symbol. Other hints to British involvement in the creation of Naziism are e.g. the similarity between British uniforms in 2nd Boer War to those of the SA. There they have invented 'concentration camps'. The German word 'Konzentrationslager' is now a (bad) literal translation of this word. In German you would say 'Sammellager'. 'To concentrate' means 'sammeln' in German. The German word 'konzentrieren' is inappropriate, since it means something like 'think hard about a certain subject' or ' make a chemical solution thicker'. To call 'herding people together' 'konzentrieren' comes from the linguistic picture, which is used in the English language for the activity of collecting (puling together). German uses a picture similar to 'picking things up' (sammeln). In this circumstances I have found, that the book 'Mein Kampf' seems to be a translation of an English script, created somewhere inside the British Intelligence (possibly Chamberlain or the 'Tavistock Institute for Human Relations'). Also the so called Hitler diaries seem to be scripts, created by the Tavistock Institute ('Scriptwriters of the Brave New World Order'), since the books carry the sign. 'F.H.' (in Old English Gothic), which could stand for 'Freud Hilton' and that for this institute. The other stream of support for Naziism stems from the collectivism side, called 'socialism'. This had as main roots other British aristocrats, especially Sir Bertrand Russel. It is certainly just coincidence, that the Lords of Tavistock have been Russels and that Swastika in Canada is located in the county Tavistock. (Maybe it is also just coincidence that one of the 7/7 bombs went of at Tavistock Square.) But socialism in total seems to originate in Britain and especially in British aristocracy. So why in the world would British Lords promote socialism? Well, it's all about money and how to extract money from the people. And that's what aristocrats are supposed to do. And it's about an 'elite', who had to defend privileges against competition by non-appointed 'capitalists'. Turning Europe upside down for this purpose was not their concern, as long as Briton stays a monarchy. TH