Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: 7 <7@enemygadgets.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Subject: Re: Where did the 3 geometric dimensions come from?
Date: Sun, 08 May 2016 15:36:26 +0000
Organization: enemygadgets.com
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <dp917fFtihtU2@mid.individual.net>
References: <dp8natFrm3hU1@mid.individual.net> <ngn9eb$dus$1@dont-email.me> <dp8sgbFsmjnU1@mid.individual.net> <ngned9$5j7$1@dont-email.me> <dp8uc6Ft298U1@mid.individual.net> <ngng9j$hfk$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
X-Trace: individual.net 9P/3HnF6mkE03CGYBOLFhgvTTg7kr15+2rzXyz0tFbGYgCCB+v
Cancel-Lock: sha1:2IeX5wh2AcTlR/f3As/EjKS/4wM=
User-Agent: KNode/4.13.3
Xref: csiph.com sci.physics:576475

Poutnik wrote:

> Dne 08/05/2016 v 15:47 7 napsal(a):
> 
>> 
>> This is kind of where I'm trying to get at.
>> 
>> If 2 quark mesons interact over a distance even if it is 3D space,
>> its behaviour would be 2D. So if you disturb a 2 quark condensate,
>> would the disturbance follow a 2D path? If the answer is yes,
>> then may be the answer to our 3D dimension is somehow related
>> to the 3 quarks in baryonic matter.
>> 
> I will reformulate the question:
> 
> What do quarks in baryons have in common
> with space dimensionality but the number 3 ?

I don't know - merely enquiring if the two are related.