Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Sylvia Else Newsgroups: sci.physics Subject: Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 13:05:07 +1100 Lines: 20 Message-ID: References: <7e3d2d26-9620-4e58-a369-9d07960786b8@googlegroups.com> <3420def7-9567-4523-a5c9-66d119bd220a@googlegroups.com> <34ce1cbf-0037-452d-b198-0ce0a186fd1f@googlegroups.com> <431a21bc-9c01-44fa-acab-c4a6fa51b556@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net 0+TCLsFITNeS6qqtxx5sOAEc2OvIYPtFmqiwpFoBJPF19tiy5I Cancel-Lock: sha1:3s9y6xbmmldE9AN/DVyhYOqs4xc= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 In-Reply-To: Xref: csiph.com sci.physics:548167 On 26/01/2016 11:22 AM, James McGinn wrote: > On Monday, January 25, 2016 at 2:40:29 PM UTC-8, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >>> Liquid. It can even be supercooled water. But it is always >>> liquid, not gas. >> >> Now, why would there be supercooled liquid drops in the air at -40 C, Jim? >> >>> Consult steam tables. >> >> You consult steam tables. Show where in steam tables it says that there >> is only liquid water in air at -40 C. > > Supercooled water is well documented in the atmosphere. Google is your friend, again. > That there can be liquid water in the air at -40C was not the point. The operative word was "only". Sylvia.