Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Sylvia Else Newsgroups: sci.physics Subject: Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2016 16:33:01 +1100 Lines: 20 Message-ID: References: <7e3d2d26-9620-4e58-a369-9d07960786b8@googlegroups.com> <446f06d2-af6c-4b3e-bbcc-60cf7f01248f@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net Ofwoj3Wf25T7hw0XD7s3WAK2d9aPA/+RN9RsNv741LfRltLA7G Cancel-Lock: sha1:RYF+fMMqu5mLe3HxeGaxSpxaS54= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 In-Reply-To: <446f06d2-af6c-4b3e-bbcc-60cf7f01248f@googlegroups.com> Xref: csiph.com sci.physics:547404 On 23/01/2016 2:34 PM, James McGinn wrote: > On Friday, January 22, 2016 at 6:41:46 PM UTC-8, Sylvia Else wrote: > >> It's all about a dynamic equilibrium between liquid water and its >> vapour. > > Uh, . . . er . . . uh . . . dynamic . . . uh . . . equi . . . > > I suspect it was you who managed to post to the moderated group >> sci.physics.research, and had this explained to you. > > Yer like, one of dem smart peeples that noes dem big words. Dang golly I wiss I wuz more smarter lyke yiew. > It's hard to see how you could have come up with an understanding of the behaviour of water without having come across those words. If you really don't know what they mean, then it's time to learn some stuff rather than just spouting nonsense. Sylvia.