Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address>
Newsgroups: sci.physics,rec.arts.sf.science,sci.astro
Subject: Re: Attempt at a return to launch site landing by SpaceX.
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 16:20:54 +1100
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <dds4tmF61acU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <n59h0i$47r$2@dont-email.me> <n5agho$h0h$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net vxluXQSF6UuLF+tM8F5mcgulsxHqQkO8WjR+YSOvoVRh64bFO+
Cancel-Lock: sha1:xXujA8rGoflFrHt8FxXCaTAuGOc=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0
In-Reply-To: <n5agho$h0h$1@dont-email.me>
Xref: csiph.com sci.physics:540763 rec.arts.sf.science:24044 sci.astro:57541

On 22/12/2015 2:37 PM, Rick Pikul/Chakat Firepaw wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Dec 2015 13:42:02 -0500, Robert Clark wrote:
>
>> Launch with an attempt at a return-to-launch-site landing pushed back to
>> today, Monday evening:
>
> An update, since no one seems to have posted it, (in ras.science at
> least):
>
> The landing was successful and the crowd at SpaceX went nuts.
>

Way to go, SpaceX.

Now, how long would NASA have taken to get this to work?

Sylvia.