Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: dvus Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy,sci.physics Subject: Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2015 22:09:02 -0500 Lines: 137 Message-ID: References:

<4o2dnZRD0KWHYN3LnZ2dnUU7-RudnZ2d@bresnan.com>

<6uSdnch4RfVxQNnLnZ2dnUU7-VudnZ2d@bresnan.com>

Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net bij+7K9jtpVJMYggo/EOyAG/QyecwrKrQBDk3c7Pq1vwsNn5Cw Cancel-Lock: sha1:pi5OQoMNAIekeBBu2muDDmJTfMU= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 In-Reply-To: X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 151114-1, 11/14/2015), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.advocacy:333083 sci.physics:533196 On 11/14/2015 2:18 PM, GreyCloud wrote: > On 11/14/15 05:30, dvus wrote: >> On 11/13/2015 4:57 PM, GreyCloud wrote: >>> On 11/12/15 16:07, dvus wrote: >>>> On 11/12/2015 1:43 PM, GreyCloud wrote: >>>>> On 11/12/15 07:22, dvus wrote: >>>>>> On 11/11/2015 10:02 PM, GreyCloud wrote: >>>>>> > dvus wrote: >>>>>> >> On 11/10/2015 6:39 PM, GreyCloud wrote: >>>>>> >>> On 11/10/15 16:00, dvus wrote: >>>>>> >>>> On 11/9/2015 8:53 PM, GreyCloud wrote: >>>>>> >>>>> On 11/09/15 14:14, Fabian Russell wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, 09 Nov 2015 13:07:54 -0700, GreyCloud wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> As I mentioned, spaces in filenames will choke ANY command >>>>>> parser >>>>>> >>>>>>>> (unless >>>>>> >>>>>>>> quoted or escaped). >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> But not on OS X. More FUD on your part, troll. >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Yes. OS X, and MS Windows, probably also have added Ebonics to >>>>>> their >>>>>> >>>>>> grammar checker. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/African_American_Vernacular_English >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> Are you a racist then? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> > >>>>> "Plim-plizzle, >>>>>> > my nizzle, don' foget bouts tha six-fo, chuch, dawg up in da hood, >>>>>> > chilly my grilly. fo sho" will pass as legitimate English in any >>>>>> > document.> >>>>>> > >>>>>> > So, this isn't racist talk then? >>>>>> >>>>>> Calling someone a racist, sexist or one of the other overused >>>>>> "ists" is >>>>>> a lazy response to remarks one cannot refute with logic. He asked if >>>>>> you >>>>>> believed those phrases should pass as legitimate English and >>>>>> instead of >>>>>> answering you leaped to the "ist" claim instead of giving your >>>>>> opinion. >>>>>> That's lazy. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> You're a moron, obviously. >>>> >>>> Baseless ad hominem, again. >>>>> >>>>> You do realize that I'm a native american? >>>> >>>> Well, your nym would suggest that, but I really have no proof one >>>> way or >>>> another. You have roots in the Clovis civilization, then? >>>> >>>>> Thought not. Didn't school teach you anything about diversity? >>>> >>>> No, it wasn't necessary. I grew up in a town where kids weren't taught >>>> bigotry. >>>> >>>>> Most likely not. >>>> >>>> Your premise is correct. >>>> >>>>> Or, you aren't the sharpest stick in the woods. >>>> >>>> No, nor the dullest. >>>> >>>>>> >>>>> Yes, I guess you are a racist slimeball. >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> >>>> Oh man, do you have any relations named Godwin? >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> >>> No. My relations are with my tribe. >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> I bet they all don't fall back on claims of racism to win >>>>>> arguments. >>>>>> You >>>>>> >> were doing well until then. >>>>>> >> >>>>>> > I take it then that you didn't read Fabians Ebonics slurs then. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Bottom line: he is racist slime. >>>>>> >>>>>> Disappointing ad hominem. You seem to have the intelligence to >>>>>> craft a >>>>>> logical retort, why not do it? >>>>>> >>>>>> (and don't play that "Followups" game, please) >>>>> >>>>> I'll do as need to do to point out your racist comments and support >>>>> of a >>>>> racist swine. >>>> >>>> Please cite any "racist" comments I made or retract. Changing Followups >>>> doesn't point out anything. >>>> >>> >>> You implied your racist bent. Obviously, you can't attribute to who >>> said what. Fabian was the one that made the racist comments. Are you >>> supporting his racism? >> >> In Message ID <6uSdnch4RfVxQNnLnZ2dnUU7-VudnZ2d@bresnan.com> in response >> to my remarks you wrote "I'll do as need to do to point out your racist >> comments and support of a racist swine." >> >> You didn't say "in support" you said "...your racist comments and >> support..." so where are my racists comments? >> >> So, I repeat, cite any "racist" comments I made or retract. >> > > Guffaw!!! So, you still support that whackjob known as Fabtard. "still" presupposes I was supporting anyone previously, an erroneous supposition on your part. > Again, you can't attribute nor tell the difference of who said what. I know exactly who said what. You seem to have a reading comprehension problem. > So, now little boy and racist swine... Fuck Off. You sound quite like an immature adolescent. If that is the case I'm wasting my time trying to reason with you. -- dvus