Path: csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!news.tal.de!news.wtal.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Thomas Heger Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy,sci.physics Subject: Re: Rocky's beliefs ( 2 t-annoy ) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 20:40:14 +0200 Lines: 66 Message-ID: References: <85417bf7-6590-49f6-94a8-b86f8f80f0c5@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net xOdB53luVFmxPzqhL4YAPgv7M3fzOqgUjSoGyopO+B5T64uMQj Cancel-Lock: sha1:fWEU27Apa3N3+SGdtlpTSaDGmrE= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0 In-Reply-To: Xref: csiph.com alt.conspiracy:264253 sci.physics:515095 Am 17.08.2015 17:38, schrieb Rocky: > "Tony Dragon" wrote in message > news:mqstun$hfi$2@dont-email.me... >> On 17/08/2015 14:28, Rocky wrote: > >>> >>> And your failure to explain why so little was left of WTC1, WTC2 and WTC3 >>> is >>> noted. BTW now that I'm at the end of this post, this is the photo I >>> post >>> all the time but it doesn't have a good shot of the sparse remains of >>> WTC3. >>> >>> http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/5090/1289/1600/Ground%20Zero%20on%209111.jpg > > >> Why should he explain that, perhaps you should do some explaining. > > ROTFLMAO because "Once you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, no > matter how improbable, must be the truth" and the following photo says no > collapse and no controlled demolition.: > http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg > I would like to draw your attention to this point: if you look at these pictures: what do you see there from the remains of the twin towers? Answer: not much. You can actually see the street level. Upon that street you see a lot of rusty steel. The pile is somehow three stories high. But: that's not enough! It is by far to little debris there! And: The debris lying there is assumed to have crushed the 400m skyscraper down to the ground. The hight of the debris could be estimated by the remains of the perimeter walls from the WTC lobby. This very characteristic panel beams are about four floors high. The debris doesn't even reach this high. Actually a building contains about 10% solid material (the rest is air), hence we would expect a pile more then ten floors high. But this is not the case. We would also expect a LOT of concrete there, what is not visible neither. So: it's blown in the wind .. (concrete!). You explain this by assumed underground nukes. But where is a crater? And the underground looked actually unscratched. And even if there was a nuke: wouldn't that throw the pieces up into the sky? And wouldn't there be a large mushroom cloud? None of these features had actually been observed, hence nukes do not match with observation. TH