Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.conspiracy,sci.physics Subject: Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 00:19:23 -0000 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 47 Sender: Jim Pennino Message-ID: References: <9nml0b57j5t8oh8cgfvphjkpp2o04vhicb@4ax.com> Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="db4120ef82bbc153014637d4cd15a795"; logging-data="12534"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1//Ef9RLMINoojOO71bUo0r" User-Agent: tin/2.2.1-20140504 ("Tober an Righ") (UNIX) (SunOS/5.10 (i86pc)) Cancel-Lock: sha1:ib1C3CDzqXQnzmXzeg4J5ARR0i0= Xref: csiph.com alt.astronomy:277056 alt.conspiracy:268699 sci.physics:523854 In sci.physics Bast wrote: > > > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> In sci.physics Bast wrote: >>> >>> >>> Sarah Ehrett wrote: >>>> On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 09:53:21 -0500, "Rocky" wrote: >>>> >>>>> To make a long story short Mike Walter claims the wings of a 757 >>>>> folded back so both the wings and the engines could fit into a small >>>>> hole. >>>> >>>> You've said Mike Walter's claims are idiocy. And we've said Mike >>>> Walter's claims are idiocy. >>>> >>>> Why do you still bring this up? Everyone agrees to the truth that >>>> American Airlines Flight 77 did NOT fold it's wings before it hit the >>>> Pentagon. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> And yet you refuse or are unable to explain how an alleged passenger >>> plane that had a wingspan of over 120' and a tail that poked 40' into >>> the air. Managed to hit a building and not leave any damage beyond a >>> 16' round hole. >> >> That is trivial; the actual hole in the outer wall was MUCH bigger than >> that, babbling kook. >> >> > > > No it wasn't,.....even if you pretend the whole crashed in section happened Yes, it was, raving lunatic. Repeating the lie does not make it so, kook. -- Jim Pennino