Path: csiph.com!feeder.erje.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!border1.nntp.ams1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!peer01.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer02.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!spln!extra.newsguy.com!newsp.newsguy.com!news4
From: jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com>
Newsgroups: sci.math,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: The Rule Of 72
Date: 24 Jun 2017 11:40:47 GMT
Organization: "Have EDDT, will travel"
Lines: 76
Message-ID: <PM000552B35C30858F@aca40855.ipt.aol.com>
References: <59441500.660A@ix.netcom.com> <59441500.660A@ix.netcom.com> <Pine.NEB.4.64.1706180046100.4820@panix5.panix.com> <59441500.660A@ix.netcom.com> <Pine.NEB.4.64.1706180046100.4820@panix5.panix.com> <59441500.660A@ix.netcom.com> <Pine.NEB.4.64.1706180046100.4820@panix5.panix.com> <oi5q6q$1oip$1@gioia.aioe.org> <PM0005523BFFEC5FCC@aca43d4d.ipt.aol.com> <oi6hiq$2p5$1@dont-email.me> <PM0005524F97315FF5@aca4299c.ipt.aol.com> <59480DFB.46CB@ix.netcom.com> <PM0005526355C9A503@aca43d9f.ipt.aol.com> <594930F4.7BE0@ix.netcom.com> <PM000552780B86337B@aca4471d.ipt.aol.com> <594AC6AE.7D61@ix.netcom.com> <PM0005528BCC8E56E9@aca43d4a.ipt.aol.com> <594BE91A.543A@ix.netcom.com> <PM0005529F3D0AE111@aca4473b.ipt.aol.com> <594D4BD8.5512@ix.netcom.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: p76460bd8994840c5408fcf22acd7d5944f11472dddb6d5c6.newsdawg.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Pineapple News/0.9.0 (Mac OS X 10.4.9 PowerPC)
X-Registered-To: [Registered Name]
X-Program-URL: http://www.platinumball.net/pineapple/news/macosx/
X-Received-Body-CRC: 2178442073
X-Received-Bytes: 3452
Xref: csiph.com sci.math:377738 sci.physics:637538 sci.physics.relativity:423358

The Starmaker wrote:
> jmfbahciv wrote:
>>
>> The Starmaker wrote:
>> > jmfbahciv wrote:
>> >>
>> >> The Starmaker wrote:
>> >> > jmfbahciv wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> The Starmaker wrote:
>> >> >> > jmfbahciv wrote:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> [some newsgroups elided]
>> >> >>
>> >> >> <snip>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > Well, if that is the case then the speed of light should read:
>> >> 299,792,459
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > somebody must have made a mistake somewhere...
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > (i was wondering how that "8" got in there...)
>> >> >>
>> >> >> The fact that you didn't read anything I wrote is noted.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> /BAH
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > i think you said it was numerlogy and not an accounting trick,
so...it's
>> all
>> >> about the number "9" in the
>> >> > world of numerology.
>> >>
>> >> That's not what I wrote.  Your flip flopped when it shouldh't have.
>> >>
>> >> <snip nonsense>
>> >>
>> >> /BAH
>> >
>> >
>> > Well, here is what you wrote:
>> >
>> > "I'm not talking about numerology.  I'm talking about real accounting
>> >  and bookkeeping practices."
>>
>> Do you know what the word "not" means?
>>
>> hmmm...perhaps this is the cause of all the confusion you have in
>> your posts.
>>
>> /BAH
>
>
> Well, I wasn't talking about "numerology" beforehand, ...but since You seem
to recognize it as "numerology" then you
> are stating it was ...numerology.

But you were doing numerology in the text which has been elided; it was
a half-assed numerology rendition.

>
>
> I mean...that's How I read it, I don't know How You read it, I can only go
by your words, not your intentions.
>
> But...you're problably a Number person and not a Word person.

No wonder you have problems in this newsgroup's topics.  I'm beginning
to understand how you think.
>
>
> I'm not a Number person...

/BAH