Path: csiph.com!feeder.erje.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!peer02.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer04.fr7!futter-mich.highwinds-media.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!post01.iad!fx03.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail Content-Type: Text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: Jeff-Relf.Me @. Message-ID: References: <0b4d6152-60ef-4cfd-892d-744cea63ddea@googlegroups.com> Newsgroups: sci.physics,comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.checkmate Subject: Too many paint chips. User-Agent: Jeff-Relf.Me/X.HTM Lines: 25 X-Complaints-To: abuse@usenet-news.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2018 23:00:22 UTC Organization: usenet-news.net Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2018 16:00:27 -0700 (Seattle) X-Received-Bytes: 1848 X-Received-Body-CRC: 2973367607 Xref: csiph.com sci.physics:702530 comp.os.linux.advocacy:467099 alt.checkmate:204299 Some random JerkOff replied ( to me ): > > > "String Theory" is a useless, unfalsifiable, random hypothesis; > > > not a "theory", like "the theory of evolution". > > > > > > Further, there are no strings in "String Theory"; > > > it's all N-dimensional branes now. > > if everything is "just a theory"... Not "everything". "The theory of evolution" is a useful, never falsified fact. "String Theory" is a useless, unfalsifiable, random hypothesis. Do you see the difference ?! Of course not, you can't; you ate too many paint chips. > how do you expect we should continue unraveling > the mysteries of the universe without theorizing, pumpkinhead? Like Fusion, "String Theory" is _ always a few years away; decade after decade, after decade, after decade. Do you see what I'm getting at ?! Of course you don't; you ate too many paint chips.