Path: csiph.com!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!border2.nntp.ams1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed9.news.xs4all.nl!85.12.16.69.MISMATCH!peer02.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer04.fr7!futter-mich.highwinds-media.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!post02.iad!fx22.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
Content-Type: Text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Jeff-Relf.Me  @.
Message-ID: <Jeff-Relf.Me@Nov.20--5.22pm.Seattle.2018>
References: <Jeff-Relf.Me@Nov.17--0.07pm.Seattle.2018> <pss9b1$rf0$1@gioia.aioe.org> <Jeff-Relf.Me@Nov.18--2.45pm.Seattle.2018> <psunko$o45$1@gioia.aioe.org> <Jeff-Relf.Me@Nov.19--2.03pm.Seattle.2018> <pt1h0i$1g2c$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy,sci.physics,alt.checkmate
Subject: " this loophole cannot be ignored " -- Alain Aspect, 2015.
User-Agent: Jeff-Relf.Me/X.HTM
Lines: 28
X-Complaints-To: abuse@blocknews.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 01:22:51 UTC
Organization: blocknews - www.blocknews.net
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 17:22:51 -0800 (Seattle)
X-Received-Bytes: 2071
X-Received-Body-CRC: 676778261
X-Original-Bytes: 1889
Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.advocacy:478324 sci.physics:713649 alt.checkmate:228253

Alain Aspect, 2015, "Physics.APS.ORG/articles/v8/123":

  " By closing two loopholes at once, three experimental tests of Bell’s 
    inequalities remove the last doubts that we should renounce local realism " 

  " one could imagine that the photons' properties
    are determined in the crystal before their emission "

  " Far fetched as it is, this residual loophole cannot be ignored, 
    but there are proposals for how to address it [30]."

A proposal to address something isn't the same thing as addressing it;
" this loophole cannot be ignored ".

If we can't _ measure local realism then, yes,
we have to "renounce" it ( too often, things can't be properly measured );
still, I'm quite sure that it exists, even if we can't measure it.

> > I'm not mainstream.
> 
> That much is certain.

Even today, Einstein isn't mainstream.
People might be in awe of him, but they don't understand him.
Whenever I see a supposed quote from Einstein, it's _ always a misattribution.

Very, very few have a clue ( it's damn close to zero );
if it wasn't so, he'd just be an ordinary guy, not a genius.