Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!peer01.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer03.fr7!futter-mich.highwinds-media.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!post02.iad!fx14.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail Content-Type: Text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: Jeff-Relf.Me @. Message-ID: References: Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy,sci.physics,alt.checkmate Subject: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. User-Agent: Jeff-Relf.Me/X.HTM Lines: 21 X-Complaints-To: abuse@blocknews.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 22:16:14 UTC Organization: blocknews - www.blocknews.net Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 14:16:14 -0800 (Seattle) X-Received-Bytes: 1646 X-Received-Body-CRC: 2082905538 Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.advocacy:478131 sci.physics:713411 alt.checkmate:227902 Kensi replied: > > Quantum Mechanics merely hints at when your drunk, > > DiceTossing god might pass out. > > KoOkiness Learn some statistics, if you can, then judge. > > QM doesn't say anything about _ UnKnowable universes... > > Of course it does, unless you intentionally butcher the theory by adding > a magical FTL nonunitary collapse fairy who butchers the wavefunction > 1.86x10^43 times per second... "butcher the theory" ? ! I didn't alter any equations; no, I just realized that QM is lame, acausal statistics. Einstein called this "the ensemble interpretation". Unsurprisingly, you fall in with the mainstream, the great unwashed, who don't understand statistics.