Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.glorb.com!news-spur1.glorb.com!newsread.glorb.com!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy,sci.physics Subject: My code is dense, and hard to read, like the Washington Post. Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 02:36:32 -0800 (Seattle) Organization: Glorb Internet Services, http://www.glorb.com Lines: 22 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: /zlDkqjrFG1Uj/denlv3LA.5.posting.glorb.com Content-Type: Text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@glorb.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 10:36:32 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Jeff-Relf.Me/X.ZIP X-Notice: Scanned by Mr. Bill Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.advocacy:385783 sci.physics:609995 You ( Michael Moroney ) replied ( to me ): > > The aforementioned people wanted shorter lines > > ( I like 236 columns ), auto formatted ( whitespace ), > > with lots of comments. > > Ewww... all that makes it so hard to follow. > One statement per line, with a sane line length. > > Proper whitespace ( including indentation where appropriate ) > breaks things up so it's readable, not a solid mass of characters. > > Comments tell the next guy what you are doing and why/how. > Old macro code I see typically has > one comment per instruction/macro call, on the right side. I'll tell you ( yet again ) what I told them: My code is dense, and hard to read, like the Washington Post; sorry, but it's _not_ like an advert, or comic strip, with lots of graphics, big fonts, color and WhiteSpace. I won the day; I retained control; I get paid -- They lost.