Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Snit Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy,sci.physics Subject: Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 10:32:56 -0700 Lines: 136 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net zGnkQI7MFTLyyLzGuPS67QGeEsQ45n4z2MJwRvS6pPP5kfG28A Cancel-Lock: sha1:IRSDMjFZgJ/OuVp7TMrcD/Zrz5Q= User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.36.0.130206 Thread-Topic: Today's Presidential Debate. Thread-Index: AdIZrllHumuDZqSL1keds9IgjVb+9A== Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.advocacy:373207 sci.physics:598673 On 9/28/16, 10:18 AM, in article nsgu1g$i38$2@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" wrote: > On 09/28/2016 09:56 AM, Snit wrote: >> On 9/28/16, 8:32 AM, in article nsgnqs$rb3$1@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" >> wrote: >> >> ... >>>>> What have you got against putin? All he wanted to do was do >>>>> business. Yet Obama has a lot of hardware on his border. Russia >>>>> doesn't have a base in our hemisphere. They only have two. So who >>>>> is surrounding who? At least Trump can do business and get a better >>>>> deal than Hillary ever will. >>>> >>>> Absolutely correct. Reason and logic escape the Prescott Parasite. >>>> >>> >>> It sounds like snit wants this war to happen. If he is on any kind of >>> subsistence packages, this war will take it away from him. >> >> Remember: what "sounds" to you is not relevant to my beliefs. > > Your beliefs are yours. > They are not mine. Correct: so when you say I want "this war" to happen I can unequivocally tell you that you are wrong, even if it "seems" to you otherwise. >>>>>> Hey, were you not against those who are supported by Soviets? >>>>> >>>>> During that era, yes. But the Soviets no longer exist. Since the >>>>> early 90s, the KGB was dismantled. Now, because of the dishonest >>>>> manner in what this country is doing, he now has started the KGB >>>>> back up. >>>> >>>> American media always wants its citizens to be scared of something. >>>> During the Cold War, they convinced Americans that Soviets were a real >>>> threat and it allowed them to spend inordinate amounts of money on the >>>> military. Then, they tried to convince everyone that terrorists were a >>>> problem. Then, it was North Korea. Now, it's Russia again even though >>>> the Muslims (not terrorists) have shown themselves to be the real >>>> issue. Having Russia as an enemy is profitable because it requires >>>> real spending on military equipment; having Muslims as an enemy does >>>> not because all it requires is for law enforcement to do their job and >>>> for administrations to deport them. Why do you think that Russia is >>>> the target of all hate? The sniveling little Prescott Parasite once >>>> again demonstrates a complete lack of reason and logic. >>> >>> The media does to assuage the military industrial complex. Going to war >>> is not the answer. >> >> Neither is Nazi-like bigotry that Slimer speaks of having. I find that >> reprehensible. > > That is our gov. stance at the current time. Trump is pushing much of the same Nazi-like bigotry. > Any other belief would be the ostrich with its head in the sand, not > wanting to hear the real truth. > >> >>> Trump actually wants to reduce our spending by >>> cutting useless government agencies and programs. We don't need them. >>> By removing our forces from all around the world we'd save an awful lot >>> of expenditures. I'm not sure if he will dump the entire federal >>> reserve system, but it is already being dumped by other countries >>> anyway, so trump may as well dump them and save a whole lot more. I >>> figure by repudiating the debt to the obscene bankers, this country >>> would be out of debt, but we have to find a way to pay back to other >>> countries that have bought up our debt. This is where the real problem >>> in this country is today... DEBT. That's why these ranchers are being >>> kicked off their land so that our government can pay off that part of >>> the debt to other countries, namely China, by giving our lands away to >>> china. >>> >>> It is hard to reason with a seasoned social justice warrior like snit. >>> They've been totally brain-washed by the progressive movement, which in >>> my opinion is a communist movement. >>> His actions and methods speak louder than words ever will. >> >> Your first five words are the only ones of that paragraph which are true in >> any way. :) >> > > On gov. spending? No, when you said: "It is hard to reason..." I was being snarky in response to your insults. > Of course. And that is precisely what he is bringing > to the table. > We'll all benefit from it in many ways. > >>>> >>>>>>> If you are in your early 30s and WWIII starts, better get your >>>>>>> affairs in order as you'll get drafted. >>>>>> >>>>>> Both Clinton and Trump will lead to war. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Just Clinton. Trump won't do it as it isn't in his nature to do >>>>> so. Remember that EisenHower said during his farewell speech that >>>>> the country needs to be aware and beware of the Industrial Military >>>>> Complex, mainly the big corporations that make money off of war. >>>>> This JFK took to heart and started the space program so that these >>>>> corporations could transition to space exploration, rather than war >>>>> time production. >>>> >>>> Well said. >>>> >>> >>> He's even agreed that this was a good idea, but then reverts to social >>> engineering tactics that are just the opposite. >>> He want's division so that the progressives can win their agenda. >> >> The "agenda" of equal rights. HOW HORRID! >> > > The "agenda" of course. Of equal rights? That, I think, is the primary "Progressive agenda." -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: * Mint KDE working with folders: * Mint KDE creating files: * Mint KDE help: * Mint KDE general navigation: * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: * OS / Word Processor Comparison: