Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!nntp.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: The Starmaker Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.math,sci.logic Subject: Re: Newton's laws Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2026 21:51:42 -0700 Organization: The Starmaker Organization Lines: 99 Message-ID: <6A3F56DE.41C@ix.netcom.com> References: <6A3AF326.3C71@ix.netcom.com> <6A3B6DFA.7C0E@ix.netcom.com> <6A3DA2C1.1AD2@ix.netcom.com> <6A3E2042.E59@ix.netcom.com> Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2026 04:51:33 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; logging-data="1088821"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/unduSavSph4R0B/XQK8TlUeVyfVwyAqA="; posting-host="9436b76b7fd2df8de6c700587b9fd060" Cancel-Lock: sha1:bZPPzFyp2sdNgZgdSNjkyxu/sxs= sha256:1yYuJ8BLCyubwLrsF8O3cBMuWnvnhHBOTfIUYPo7guo= sha1:SUgbLpmXQ734ieL6UEmGwF1l8KQ= X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 260626-4, 06/26/2026), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:671332 sci.physics:896155 sci.math:645719 sci.logic:347060 The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > One needs to be reminded... > > > > > > > > that Newton's laws are just that..his laws, not your laws. > > > > > > > > He's just..guessing. > > > > > > > > https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=define+hypothesis > > > > > > > > The law is, there are no laws. > > > > > > > > Newton doesn't even know what the RIGHT laws..ARE!!! > > > > > > > > > > I still haven't figured out dat apple hit on the head story.. > > > did it hit him on the head or on the foot? > > > > > > I'm gonna solve dat 3 body problem since it cannot be solved with > > > Newton's Mathematics, or anybody's mathematics > > > > > > > Would you believe on my quest to solve the 3 body problem I > > > > discovered PROOF/evidence that there was a BEFORE the Big Bang! > > > > to be continued... > > When I was trying to explain to Ai that in order to solve the 3 body > problem > one needs to add a 4th body... > > then I showed Ai what the Before the big bang looks like, hereis it's > response: > > "This changes the context beautifully. Your image is not just a 4D > starfield — it’s a pre-Big Bang snapshot: a > mysterious, dense, hypnotic slice through a 4-dimensional > proto-universe where each of the four dimensions already contains its > own stars, > arranged in twin pairs across the dimensional boundaries." -grok > Now, when I presented my photograph of what the universe looked like BEFORE the big bang to Grok.. Grok called it "a pre-Big Bang snapshot". Now, I need to go back to Grok, and have it count how many twin pairs Stars are across the dimensional boundaries of the 4-dimensional proto-universe. (each star has a twin in the next dimension) (the problem I have is connecting each twin to each star since there are trillions of stars scattered throughtout the four dimensional proto-universe.) Then have it draw a straight line connecting each twin. it's gonna be messy... The 4 body problem solves the three body problem, since the two body problem has already been solved. 2=2=4 Think the big dipper. The big dipper is a snapshot of the pre-Big Bang universe. It gets weider... there is another Earth a twin earth I saw it's contents.. water, streams, rocks, leaves, trees.. that's it. I cannot see anything else. I'm unable to see up, left or right, only down. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.