Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!nntp.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics
Subject: Re: It's their nightmare.
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2026 13:21:05 -0700
Organization: The Starmaker Organization
Lines: 71
Message-ID: <6A3C3C31.68D3@ix.netcom.com>
References: <6A38C343.7D67@ix.netcom.com> <6A3A1802.1EDE@ix.netcom.com>
Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2026 20:20:51 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; logging-data="3446991"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19IBJz8oi8fgSdjMGNHXxGEJo2RaG+M8kg="; posting-host="1ed8f5c93e4b828168337ca19e6a96d8"
Cancel-Lock: sha1:jn0jBlw5Xz3MVQaf8BOGeY0X4ck= sha256:gw9Dd6Kf6sykoJDc3OCjpfV32Lv26jEYHGS1TnGEK98= sha1:ZFQ8QlfVfRCLhkvN1n2zjjbv6uE=
X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 260624-6, 06/24/2026), Outbound message
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:671326 sci.physics:896151

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > notice a patteren with
> > these 'science guys' and their
> > papers?
> >
> > They got these 'papers'
> > that seem..from decades ago.
> >
> > It's like a nightmare.
> >
> > They keep going back to it.
> >
> > to...old ideas.
> >
> > keep refering to
> > old ideas.
> >
> > It's their nightmare.
> >
> > It's their first paper..
> > its their last.
> >
> > years pass and
> > they keep going
> > back to it.
> >
> > a nightmare.
> >
> > Good thing
> > I can tear it up the
> > minute I see it.
> >
> > take it to the back
> > of the barn and shoot it.
> >
> > In Alaska
> > they put these people
> > on a boat and let them drown..
> 
> I mean, yous keep refering to a guy named
> Newton, Sir Isaac born in 1642 and died 1727..
> and doesn't seem to make any progress since.
> 
> Of course, if you keep refering to a guy born in the year 1642..
> 
> how can science progress if you keep going back to 1642???
> 
> It's 2026, there is no one else to refer to today????
> 

My only conclusion is no breakthroughs in science have been made
since...1642.

or 1727.

Newton, Sir Isaac would be shocked! 

Did a watermellon hit their heads???






-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.