Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!nntp.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: The Starmaker Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics Subject: Re: Nobody understands relativity Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2026 22:54:49 -0700 Organization: The Starmaker Organization Lines: 62 Message-ID: <6A2A4DA9.4034@ix.netcom.com> References: <1100uil$1ocdk$1@dont-email.me> <1101nvd$20vmu$1@dont-email.me> <1101s33$20m41$1@dont-email.me> <1103kbl$2fj1p$1@dont-email.me> <6A2649AC.5BE7@ix.netcom.com> <18b704a2d231ce27$2$2346$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <1105rrm$326di$1@dont-email.me> <18b70ec3c1cec12b$1$2127$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <1106t10$3cdsu$1@dont-email.me> <18b72bfdee4e4126$4$2346$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <1108ima$3qq7e$1@dont-email.me> <1109npe$76mb$3@dont-email.me> <6A29DCBE.3B20@ix.netcom.com> Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2026 05:54:37 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; logging-data="1321022"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+d8+8NgN7g8jGNqq2d/ZswfchUuOD28Ow="; posting-host="3dcabbf7eb10f093f8af8911d3e12d54" Cancel-Lock: sha1:cUsM8t/VtjOH1g1H406MjIFp3Bo= sha256:uh/jtnkGpWqFjErr6tnPDgdywnwmklhZPcHfQVkhQLg= sha1:wZ3YXChpTFIGl624AtLu+fZ/YEc= X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 260610-2, 06/10/2026), Outbound message X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:671175 sci.physics:896092 Ross Finlayson wrote: > > On 06/10/2026 02:53 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > > Ross Finlayson wrote: > >> > >> On 06/09/2026 12:05 PM, Paul B. Andersen wrote: > >>> Den 09.06.2026 16:10, skrev Ross Finlayson: > >>>> > >>>> So, another way to identify a metrology of time is "quasars" > >>>> instead of "hyper-fine transitions of the cesium atom, > >>>> in a museum in France". > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> :-D > >>> > >> > >> Thanks for writing. > >> > >> I'm curious how to interpret the smiley, usually enough it's > >> a reaction of spontaneous happiness, yet in some regards it's > >> as like the monkey's grimace that's usually aggression or fear. > >> > >> Then, the idea that there are "collective clocks" and that for > >> time there are independent metrologies of time as about > >> > >> the atomic clock, > >> the synchroton clock, > >> and the quasar clock, > > > > and the biological clock...It's LOGICAL!!! bio wise. > > > > it's ticks. > > it's tocks. > > > > a pretty girl on a hot stove ..is relativity. > > > > > > > >> > >> that would advise a lot of the context about "the clock hypothesis", > >> and also the role of clocks with rigid measuring rods of length, > >> for the metrology (the science of measurement) of space, > >> the metrologies, a metrology. > > > > Shut up StarMaker, you never said any decent damn thing about science. > > Trite trollop, .... Here's mt ten cents... you put 3 atomic clocks in a room and calibrate them to the same time..that isn't independent metrologies of time, it's dependent. best ten cents i ever spent. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.