Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy,sci.physics Subject: Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2015 17:22:14 -0000 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 27 Sender: Jim Pennino Message-ID: <63cpac-e84.ln1@mail.specsol.com> References: Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="db4120ef82bbc153014637d4cd15a795"; logging-data="4411"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18TigQ1yVC5YZ9ZPJ0X8wMR" User-Agent: tin/2.2.1-20140504 ("Tober an Righ") (UNIX) (SunOS/5.10 (i86pc)) Cancel-Lock: sha1:7evOpNhOhGx8X3j5cKKH+X9ZhI4= Xref: csiph.com alt.conspiracy:264754 sci.physics:516147 In sci.physics Rocky wrote: > BTW it has already been proven that the media changed the audio from > broadcast to broadcast so what you are hearing in the "collapse" videos > could be a bogus soundtrack because I believe vaporized buildings make very > little noise and they certainly don't crash to the ground as proven by the > low seismic readings of the great 9/11 hoax. The energy of a building collapse is miniscule compared to a nuclear explosion, kook. When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a huge and unique seismic signature that can be detected by a seismograph anywhere on the planet. There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 by any seismograph anywhere in the world but the collapse of the two towers as well as the crashes at the Pentagon and in Pennsylvania were detected by nearby seismographs. This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11. http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/wtc/seismic/WTC_PENT_KIM.htm http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/seismic.html -- Jim Pennino